Institutional ownership and cost of debt: evidence from Thailand

被引:3
|
作者
Thanatawee, Yordying [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Burapha Univ, Burapha Business Sch, Chon Buri, Thailand
[2] Burapha Univ, Burapha Business Sch, 169 Longhaad Bangsaen Rd, Saensuk 20131, Thailand
来源
COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT | 2023年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Cost of Debt; Institutional Ownership; Monitoring; Agency Problem; Corporate Governance; Thailand; RETURN VOLATILITY EVIDENCE; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; AGENCY COSTS; LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; CASH HOLDINGS; BOND RATINGS; FIRM VALUE; INVESTORS; SPECIFICATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/23311975.2023.2207693
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article aims to investigate whether institutional investors aid in lowering the cost of debt using a sample of 311 nonfinancial firms listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) over 2011-2020. All data were obtained from the SETSMART database. Controlling for firm characteristics, industry effect, and year effect, we analyze the link between institutional ownership and the cost of debt using pooled ordinary least squares and fixed effects models and find that institutional ownership has a negative relationship with the cost of debt in both models. The fixed effects model also shows that profitability, growth potential, and operating cash flow negatively affect the cost of debt while financial leverage and asset tangibility positively affect the cost of debt. Additionally, the dynamic GMM model indicates that the connection between institutional holdings and debt expenses is significantly negative. Overall, the results suggest that institutional investors provide effective oversight that decreases conflicts between management and lenders, ultimately cutting the cost of borrowing for listed companies in Thailand. In addition, our supplementary analysis suggests that institutional investors must possess a sizeable proportion of shares (at least 23%) to actively perform monitoring duties.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Institutional Ownership and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Iran
    Moradi, Mohammad
    Yazdifar, Hassan
    Eskandar, Hoda
    Namazi, Navid Reza
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [42] Price informativeness and institutional ownership: Evidence from Japan
    Luo M.
    Chen T.
    Yan I.K.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2014, 42 (4) : 627 - 651
  • [43] Institutional ownership and earnings management: Evidence from India
    Potharla, Srikanth
    Bhattacharjee, Kaushik
    Iyer, Vishwanathan
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 9 (01):
  • [44] Corporate governance and institutional ownership: evidence from Jordan
    Al-Najjar, Basil
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2010, 10 (02): : 176 - +
  • [45] Institutional ownership and earnings quality: Evidence from China
    Ali, Muhammad Jahangir
    Biswas, Pallab Kumar
    Chapple, Larelle
    Kumarasinghe, Sriyalatha
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 84
  • [46] Institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial misreporting
    Burns, Natasha
    Kedia, Simi
    Lipson, Marc
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2010, 16 (04) : 443 - 455
  • [47] Institutional ownership and liquidity commonality: evidence from Australia
    Bradrania, Reza
    Elliott, Robert
    Wu, Winston
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 62 : 1231 - 1272
  • [48] Acquisitions and the cost of debt: Evidence from China
    Wang, Kun Tracy
    Wu, Yue
    Sun, Aonan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 78
  • [49] Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt
    Anderson, RC
    Mansi, SA
    Reeb, DM
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 68 (02) : 263 - 285
  • [50] Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence
    Boubakri, Narjess
    Ghouma, Hatem
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (10) : 2481 - 2499