Effect of vaginal delivery on adverse pregnancy outcomes after cesarean section in scar uterus

被引:0
|
作者
Dong, Linlin [1 ]
Tang, Qian [1 ]
Chen, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Obstet Dept, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Obstet Dept, Chongqing 401120, Peoples R China
关键词
Cesarean section; second pregnancy; vaginal delivery; delivery mode; pregnancy outcomes;
D O I
10.1080/02648725.2023.2199575
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of vaginal delivery on adverse pregnancy outcomes after cesarean section for the cicatricial uterus. Eighty patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section admitted to our hospital from October 2019 to May 2021 were selected for the study. Among them, 44 cases were eligible for vaginal delivery. Thirty-eight cases of cesarean delivery were selected as the control group and 42 cases of vaginal delivery were selected as the observation group according to the mode of delivery. Baseline data, 24-h blood loss, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, 5-minute Apger score, and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. When comparing the age, gestational age, number of pregnancies, and duration of cesarean delivery between the two groups (t = 1.333, 0.989, 0.597, 0.752, P > 0.05), the scar thickness in the observation group was higher than that in the control group. The 24-h postpartum bleeding and hospitalization cost was lower in the observation group than in the control group, the hospitalization time was shorter than in the control group, and the 5-minute Apger score was higher than in the control group (t = 21.744, 15.029, 11.524, 7.342, P < 0.05). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications was compared between the two groups (23.68% vs 7.14%, 7.89% vs 0.00%, correction 2 = 1.083, 1.605, P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was 7.14% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than the 31.57% in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (correction 2 = 4.060, P < 0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:2497 / 2507
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section
    Pomorski, Michal
    Fuchs, Tomasz
    Rosner-Tenerowicz, Anna
    Zimmer, Mariusz
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 88 (04) : 174 - 179
  • [22] Rupture of the uterus through the cesarean section scar
    Novak, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1918, 71 : 105 - 106
  • [23] Anal incontinence: Relationship to pregnancy, vaginal delivery, and cesarean section
    Fenner, Dee
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2006, 30 (05) : 261 - 266
  • [24] VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER ONE CESAREAN-SECTION
    VANDERWALT, WA
    CRONJE, HS
    BAM, RH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1994, 46 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [25] Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section
    Ramos Borges, Joao Bosco
    Guarisi, Telma
    Marchesini de Camargo, Ana Carolina
    Gollop, Thomaz Rafael
    Machado, Rogerio Bonassi
    de Godoy Borges, Pitia Carita
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2010, 8 (02): : 192 - 196
  • [26] Vaginal delivery after cesarean section, a point of view
    Soltan, MH
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 17 (05) : 626 - 632
  • [27] Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section
    Schei, Berit
    Johannessen, Hege Holmo
    Rydning, Astrid
    Sultan, Abdul
    Morkved, Siv
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [28] VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION
    PLOTZ, EJ
    GYNAKOLOGE, 1986, 19 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [29] VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION
    FLEISHER, AA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 144 (01) : 117 - 117
  • [30] Vaginal delivery after cesarean section - Is the risk acceptable?
    Greene, MF
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (01): : 54 - 55