Effect of vaginal delivery on adverse pregnancy outcomes after cesarean section in scar uterus

被引:0
|
作者
Dong, Linlin [1 ]
Tang, Qian [1 ]
Chen, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Obstet Dept, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Obstet Dept, Chongqing 401120, Peoples R China
关键词
Cesarean section; second pregnancy; vaginal delivery; delivery mode; pregnancy outcomes;
D O I
10.1080/02648725.2023.2199575
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of vaginal delivery on adverse pregnancy outcomes after cesarean section for the cicatricial uterus. Eighty patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section admitted to our hospital from October 2019 to May 2021 were selected for the study. Among them, 44 cases were eligible for vaginal delivery. Thirty-eight cases of cesarean delivery were selected as the control group and 42 cases of vaginal delivery were selected as the observation group according to the mode of delivery. Baseline data, 24-h blood loss, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, 5-minute Apger score, and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. When comparing the age, gestational age, number of pregnancies, and duration of cesarean delivery between the two groups (t = 1.333, 0.989, 0.597, 0.752, P > 0.05), the scar thickness in the observation group was higher than that in the control group. The 24-h postpartum bleeding and hospitalization cost was lower in the observation group than in the control group, the hospitalization time was shorter than in the control group, and the 5-minute Apger score was higher than in the control group (t = 21.744, 15.029, 11.524, 7.342, P < 0.05). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications was compared between the two groups (23.68% vs 7.14%, 7.89% vs 0.00%, correction 2 = 1.083, 1.605, P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was 7.14% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than the 31.57% in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (correction 2 = 4.060, P < 0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:2497 / 2507
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SCAR FORMATION IN UTERUS AFTER CESAREAN SECTION
    WOJDECKI, J
    GRYNSZTA.A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1970, 107 (02) : 322 - &
  • [2] VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER CESAREAN SECTION
    RIVA, HL
    TEICH, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1961, 81 (03) : 501 - &
  • [3] Vaginal delivery after Cesarean section
    Mennick, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2006, 106 (01) : 21 - 21
  • [4] Vaginal delivery after Cesarean section
    Mason, NR
    BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL, 1917, 176 : 127 - 133
  • [5] Effect of Birth Weight on Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Laroche, Liny
    Duperron, Louise
    Brassard, Normand
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (02): : 338 - 343
  • [6] VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION IN WOMEN WITH UNKNOWN TYPES OF UTERINE SCAR
    BEALL, M
    EGLINTON, GS
    CLARK, SL
    PHELAN, JP
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1984, 29 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [7] Impact of vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean section on perinatal outcomes
    Madi, Jose Mauro
    Deon, Jonatas
    Rombaldi, Renato Luis
    de Araujo, Breno Fauth
    Rombaldi, Marcelo Costamilan
    dos Santos, Matheus Bennemann
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2013, 35 (11): : 516 - 522
  • [8] Effect of Birth Weight on Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Reply
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Brassard, Normand
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (05): : 1089 - 1090
  • [9] Vaginal delivery after previous Cesarean section
    Chua, S
    Arulkumaran, S
    Choo, WL
    NEW INSIGHTS IN GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1998, : 243 - 250
  • [10] VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    VERIDIANO, NP
    THORNER, NS
    DUCEY, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1989, 29 (04) : 307 - 311