Clinical outcome and safety of holmium laser prostate enucleation after transrectal prostate biopsies for benign prostatic hyperplasia

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, See Min [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Chang Seok [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Dae Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Jae Hwi [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Chunwoo [2 ,3 ]
Jeh, Seong Uk [1 ,2 ]
Kam, Sung Chul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hwa, Jeong Seok [1 ,2 ]
Hyun, Jae Seog [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Gyeongsang Natl Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Jinju, South Korea
[2] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Jinju, South Korea
[3] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Changwon Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Chang Won, South Korea
[4] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Gyeongsang Natl Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Inst Hlth Sci,Dept Urol, 79 Gangnam Ro, Jinju 52727, South Korea
关键词
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Enucleation; Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Transrectal biopsy; ANTIGEN; CANCER; VOLUME; MEN; COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTORS; AGE;
D O I
10.4111/icu.20230276
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TR biopsy) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 556 patients who underwent HoLEP between 2014 and 2021. The patients were categorized into six groups: Group 1-A (n=45) underwent HoLEP within four months post TR biopsy. Group 1-B (n=94) underwent HoLEP more than four months post TR biopsy. Group 1-C (n=120) underwent HoLEP after a single TR biopsy. Group 1-D (n=19) underwent HoLEP after two or more TR biopsies. Group 1-total (n=139, group 1-A+group 1-B or group 1-C+group 1-D) underwent HoLEP post TR biopsy. Group 2 (control group, n=417) underwent HoLEP without prior TR biopsy. We examined perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes. Results: The age, body mass index, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, and comorbid diseases between group 1-total and group 2 were comparable. However, group 1-total exhibited significantly elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and larger prostate volumes (p<0.01). Perioperative factors like enucleation time, enucleation weight, and catheterization duration were notably higher in group 1-total (p<0.01). All groups showed significant improvements in IPSS, postvoid residual urine, and maximum flow rate during the 1-year postoperative period (p<0.05). The rates of postoperative complications were similar between group 1-total and group 2. Conclusions: Enucleation time and catheterization duration were significantly longer in the TR biopsy group. However, postoperative complications were not significantly different between TR biopsy and non-TR biopsy groups.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 156
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate and Transurethral Resection of Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Zhong, Jian
    Feng, Zhenhua
    Peng, Yeping
    Liang, Hao
    UROLOGY, 2019, 131 : 14 - 19
  • [42] A Comparative Study on Outcome of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostateand Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Khan, Sohrab
    Rehman, Shahjehanur
    Zaidi, Kamran
    Qamar, Saleem Shahzad Shumas
    Sajjad, Kumail
    Ullah, Ismat
    Nazir, Muhammad
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2020, 26 (03): : 480 - 484
  • [43] Sexual outcome of patients undergoing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Carmignani, Luca
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    Macchi, Alberto
    Maruccia, Serena
    Picozzi, Stefano
    Casellato, Stefano
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2015, 17 (05) : 802 - 806
  • [44] Holmium laser assisted 'anatomical' enucleation of adenoma of benign hyperplasia of prostate
    Bapat, Shivadeo S.
    Pai, Ketan V.
    Purnapatre, Satyajeet S.
    Yadav, Pushkaraj B.
    Padhye, Abhijit S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 22 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [45] Effects of Changes in Erectile Function After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Sato, Ryo
    Sano, Asuka
    Watanabe, Kyohei
    Matsushita, Yuto
    Watanabe, Hiromitsu
    Tamura, Keita
    Motoyama, Daisuke
    Sugiyama, Takayuki
    Otsuka, Atsushi
    Miyake, Hideaki
    IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (06): : 2960 - 2964
  • [46] Electrophysiological differences between typical and dense benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues retrieved after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
    Kim, Hyeon Woo
    Yun, Joho
    Kim, Young Keum
    Shin, Dong Gil
    Lee, Jong-Hyun
    Lee, Jeong Zoo
    JOURNAL OF INCLUSION PHENOMENA AND MACROCYCLIC CHEMISTRY, 2019, 94 (3-4) : 319 - 327
  • [47] Electrophysiological differences between typical and dense benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues retrieved after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
    Hyeon Woo Kim
    Joho Yun
    Young Keum Kim
    Dong Gil Shin
    Jong-Hyun Lee
    Jeong Zoo Lee
    Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, 2019, 94 : 319 - 327
  • [48] Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Persistent Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Prior Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery
    Jaeger, Christopher D.
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (05) : 1025 - 1029
  • [49] Comparison of holmium laser enucleation with bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of a multicentre study
    Tuncel, Altug
    Aykanat, Can
    Akdemir, Serkan
    Oksay, Taylan
    Arslan, Murat
    Basboga, Serdar
    Aslan, Yilmaz
    Balci, Melih
    Guzel, Ozer
    ANDROLOGIA, 2022, 54 (06)
  • [50] Is Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate a Good Surgical Alternative in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management? A Review Article
    Abedi, Amirreza
    Razzaghi, Mohammad Reza
    Rahavian, Amirhossein
    Hazrati, Ebrahim
    Aliakbari, Fereshte
    Vahedisoraki, Vahid
    Allameh, Farzad
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 11 (02) : 197 - 203