Classical vs. Quantum Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Detection

被引:2
|
作者
DIaz-Santos, Sonia [1 ]
Escanez-Exposito, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laguna, Inst Univ Estudios Mujeres, San Cristobal la Laguna 38200, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Univ La Laguna, Dept Comp Engn & Syst, San Cristobal la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
关键词
Quantum Machine Learning; Quantum Classification; Variational Quantum Classifier; Support Vector Classification; Breast Cancer Detection;
D O I
10.1109/DRCN57075.2023.10108230
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is one of the top causes of mortality in women throughout the world, and early identification is critical for successful treatment. The accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis has been improved thanks to machine learning. This research compares the effectiveness of conventional and quantum machine learning systems for detecting breast cancer in great detail. Using a publically accessible data set, the project will examine several quantum machine learning models and compare them to classical machine learning algorithms. The results of this study could provide insights into the potential benefits of quantum machine learning for breast cancer detection and ultimately contribute to improving the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine Learning in a Post Moore's Law World: Quantum vs. Neuromorphic Substrates
    Henke, Kyle
    Kenyon, Garrett T.
    Ben Migliori
    2020 IEEE SOUTHWEST SYMPOSIUM ON IMAGE ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (SSIAI 2020), 2020, : 74 - 77
  • [32] Classical and quantum machine learning applications in spintronics
    Ghosh, Kumar J. B.
    Ghosh, Sumit
    DIGITAL DISCOVERY, 2023, 2 (02): : 512 - 519
  • [33] Enhancing Breast Cancer Detection with Ensemble Machine Learning Models
    Mohammed, Dawood Salim
    Ahmed, Firas Saaduldeen
    Mohammad, Havall Muhssin
    Hussain, Zozan Saadallah
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 20 (05) : 2255 - 2265
  • [34] Machine Learning Applications for Automated Breast Cancer Detection and Analysis
    Bagewadi, Priya B.
    Patil, Sujata N.
    Parameshachari, B. D.
    Madiwalar, Shweta
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 13 (13): : 21 - 27
  • [35] Accurate Breast Cancer Detection and Classification by Machine Learning Approach
    Sandeep, D.
    Bethel, G. N. Beena
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON I-SMAC (IOT IN SOCIAL, MOBILE, ANALYTICS AND CLOUD) (I-SMAC 2021), 2021, : 366 - 371
  • [36] Machine learning vs. hybrid machine learning model for optimal operation of a chiller
    Park, Sungho
    Ahn, Ki Uhn
    Hwang, Seungho
    Choi, Sunkyu
    Park, Cheol Soo
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 25 (02) : 209 - 220
  • [37] Matter-Aggregating Systems at a Classical vs. Quantum Interface
    Gadomski, Adam
    Kruszewska, Natalia
    ENTROPY, 2025, 27 (03)
  • [38] Comparing Latency and Power Consumption: Quantum vs. Classical Preprocessing
    Amiri, Zuhra
    Noetzel, Janis
    2023 IEEE 9TH WORLD FORUM ON INTERNET OF THINGS, WF-IOT, 2023,
  • [39] Quantum vs. classical information: operator negativity as a probe of scrambling
    Kudler-Flam, Jonah
    Nozaki, Masahiro
    Ryu, Shinsei
    Tan, Mao Tian
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2020, 2020 (01)
  • [40] Human vs. Machine Learning Based Detection of Facial Weakness Using Video Analysis
    Aldridge, Chad M.
    McDonald, Mark M.
    Wruble, Mattia
    Zhuang, Yan
    Uribe, Omar
    McMurry, Timothy L.
    Lin, Iris
    Pitchford, Haydon
    Schneider, Brett J.
    Dalrymple, William A.
    Carrera, Joseph F.
    Chapman, Sherita
    Worrall, Bradford B.
    Rohde, Gustavo K.
    Southerland, Andrew M.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13