Smart Readiness Indicator (SRI) as a Decision-Making Tool for Low Carbon Buildings

被引:9
|
作者
Chatzikonstantinidis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Giama, Effrosyni [1 ]
Fokaides, Paris A. [2 ,3 ]
Papadopoulos, Agis M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Mech Engn, Proc Equipment Design Lab, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Frederick Univ, Sch Engn, 7 Frederickou St, CY-1036 Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] Kaunas Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Architecture, 48 Studentu St, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
climate change mitigation policies; low-carbon economy; circular economy; energy technology plan; smart readiness indicator; smart buildings; energy flexibility; low carbon society; IoT;
D O I
10.3390/en17061406
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
According to the European Energy Efficiency Directive for Buildings, member states are required to develop long-term strategies to adopt more sustainable, secure, and decarbonized energy systems in buildings by 2050. In this line of approach, an optional common regime has been established to define and calculate the smart readiness of buildings and assess their ability to adapt their operation to the needs of the occupants and the network. Thus, the smart readiness indicator (SRI) emerged, which assesses technological readiness by examining the presence and evaluation of the functionality level of various smart services, aiming at energy savings, the ability of the building to respond to users' needs, and energy flexibility. This paper focuses on examining the SRI calculation methodology's application to an office building, which is currently being deeply renovated. Initially, there is an analysis of the SRI, its calculation methodology, and its goals. This is followed by the practical calculation part of the SRI for a typical office building located in Greece and belonging to the climate zone of southern Europe. The results indicate that the SRIs application is not a straightforward issue since parameters that need to be considered are not regulated to the same degree. On the other hand, SRI can provide a stimulus for exploiting the renovation potential of buildings, precisely by integrating the various aspects and linking those to the use of innovative technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A BASIC TOOL FOR EVERYDAY DECISION-MAKING
    GRAHAM, MA
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS WORLD, 1982, 5 (10) : 69 - 70
  • [32] LEAD MODELING - A DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    MCEVOY, JE
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1980, 16 (03) : 231 - 237
  • [33] Sarcopenia as a tool for preoperative decision-making
    Rangel, Erika L.
    Rios-Diaz, Arturo J.
    Uyeda, Jennifer W.
    Castillo-Angeles, Manuel
    Cooper, Zara
    Olufajo, Olubode A.
    Salim, Ali
    Sodickson, Aaron D.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2019, 86 (02): : 377 - 379
  • [34] Risk analysis, a tool for decision-making
    vandenBrand, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 1996, 6 (4-6) : 388 - 396
  • [35] CORPORATE MODEL AS DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    WEINBERG, RS
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1964, 16 (09): : 1030 - &
  • [36] PROBABILITY METHOD AS A DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    QUIBALLO, EJ
    HEATING-PIPING-AIR CONDITIONING, 1985, 57 (03): : 113 - 115
  • [37] SEZ GIS - A decision-making tool
    Carr, B
    THIRD REGIONAL APCOM: COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN THE MINERALS INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, 1998, 98 (05): : 43 - 44
  • [38] OntoAgency: An agency-based ontology for tracing control, ownership and decision-making in smart buildings
    de Souza, Clarice Bleil
    Badyina, Anna
    Golubchikov, Oleg
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 256
  • [39] Smart retrofitting for office buildings: Comparison of decision-making criteria between developing and developed regions
    Peiris, Sanduni
    Lai, Joseph H. K.
    Kumaraswamy, Mohan M.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 97
  • [40] Shot peening optimization with complex decision-making tool: Multi criteria decision-making
    Unal, Okan
    Maleki, Erfan
    MEASUREMENT, 2018, 125 : 133 - 141