CMIP6 precipitation and temperature projections for Chile

被引:10
|
作者
Salazar, Alvaro [1 ,2 ]
Thatcher, Marcus [3 ]
Goubanova, Katerina [4 ]
Bernal, Patricio [5 ]
Gutierrez, Julio [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Squeo, Francisco [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Barrio Univ, Inst Ecol & Biodivers IEB, Victoria 631, Concepcion, Chile
[2] Univ La Serena, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol, Casilla 554, La Serena, Chile
[3] CSIRO Environm, Aspendale, Vic 3195, Australia
[4] Ctr Estudios Avanzados Zonas Aridas CEAZA, La Serena, Chile
[5] CSIRO Chile Res Fdn, Santiago, Chile
关键词
General circulation models; IPCC; South America; Andes; Climate projections; Chile; REGIONAL CLIMATE; ANDES; UNCERTAINTIES; HYDROCLIMATE; VARIABILITY; MEGADROUGHT; EXPANSION; IMPACTS; DROUGHT; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00382-023-07034-9
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Precipitation and near-surface temperature from an ensemble of 36 new state-of-the-art climate models under the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) are evaluated over Chile's climate. The analysis is focused on four distinct climatic subregions: Northern Chile, Central Chile, Northern Patagonia, and Southern Patagonia. Over each of the subregions, first, we evaluate the performance of individual global climate models (GCMs) against a suit of precipitation and temperature observation-based gridded datasets over the historical period (1986-2014) and then we analyze the models' projections for the end of the century (2080-2099) for four different shared socioeconomic pathways scenarios (SSP). Although the models are characterized by general wet and warm mean bias, they reproduce realistically the main spatiotemporal climatic variability over different subregions. However, none of the models is best across all subregions for both precipitation and temperature. Moreover, among the best performing models defined based on the Taylor skill score, one finds the so-called "hot models" likely exhibiting an overestimated climate sensitivity, which suggests caution in using these models for accessing future climate change in Chile. We found robust (90% of models agree in the direction of change) projected end-of-the-century reductions in mean annual precipitation for Central Chile (similar to - 20 to similar to - 40%) and Northern Patagonia (similar to - 10 to similar to - 30%) under scenario SSP585, but changes are strong from scenario SSP245 onwards, where precipitation is reduced by 10-20%. Northern Chile and Southern Patagonia show non-robust changes in precipitation across the models. Yet, future near-surface temperature warming presented high inter-model agreement across subregions, where the greatest increments occurred along the Andes Mountains. Northern Chile displays the strongest increment of up to similar to 6 degrees C in SSP585, followed by Central Chile (up to similar to 5 degrees C). Both Northern and Southern Patagonia show a corresponding increment by up to similar to 4 degrees C. We also briefly discuss about the environmental and socio-economic implications of these future changes for Chile.
引用
收藏
页码:2475 / 2498
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: the case of Northeastern Iran
    Zamani, Yasin
    Hashemi Monfared, Seyed Arman
    Azhdari Moghaddam, Mehdi
    Hamidianpour, Mohsen
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2020, 142 (3-4) : 1613 - 1623
  • [32] Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Wu, Yi
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Slater, Louise
    Fan, Xuewei
    Chai, Yuanfang
    Sorooshian, Soroosh
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (01) : E2374 - E2389
  • [33] Spatiotemporal differences and uncertainties in projections of precipitation and temperature in South Korea from CMIP6 and CMIP5 general circulation models
    Song, Young Hoon
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (13) : 5899 - 5919
  • [34] Performance Evaluation of CMIP6 Climate Model Projections for Precipitation and Temperature in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia
    Enyew, Fekadie Bazie
    Sahlu, Dejene
    Tarekegn, Gashaw Bimrew
    Hama, Sarkawt
    Debele, Sisay E.
    CLIMATE, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [35] QBO Changes in CMIP6 Climate Projections
    Butchart, Neal
    Anstey, James A.
    Kawatani, Yoshio
    Osprey, Scott M.
    Richter, Jadwiga H.
    Wu, Tongwen
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (07)
  • [36] Future Projections and Uncertainty Assessment of Precipitation Extremes in Iran from the CMIP6 Ensemble
    Hong, Juyoung
    Javan, Khadijeh
    Shin, Yonggwan
    Park, Jeong-Soo
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (08)
  • [37] Observed and Future Precipitation and Evapotranspiration in Water Management Zones of Uganda: CMIP6 Projections
    Onyutha, Charles
    Asiimwe, Arnold
    Ayugi, Brian
    Ngoma, Hamida
    Ongoma, Victor
    Tabari, Hossein
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (07)
  • [38] Investigating the Future Precipitation Changes Over the Kingdom of Bahrain Using CMIP6 Projections
    Drisya, J.
    Al-Zubari, Waleed Khalil
    EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025,
  • [39] Projected Change in Temperature and Precipitation Over Africa from CMIP6
    Almazroui, Mansour
    Saeed, Fahad
    Saeed, Sajjad
    Nazrul Islam, M.
    Ismail, Muhammad
    Klutse, Nana Ama Browne
    Siddiqui, Muhammad Haroon
    EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 4 (03) : 455 - 475
  • [40] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (1-2) : 535 - 548