Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:4
|
作者
Froiio, Caterina [1 ]
Aiolfi, Alberto [2 ]
Bona, Davide [2 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen & Foregut Surg, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen Surg, IRCCS Galeazzi St Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
magnetic sphincter augmentation device; LINX; erosion; dysphagia; MSA removal; gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; DEVICE; EFFICACY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) procedure is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adverse events requiring MSA device removal are rare, but the true prevalence and incidence may be underestimated.Methods: Retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Patients who underwent MSA procedure between March 2007 and September 2021 in two tertiary-care referral centers for esophageal surgery were included. The trend of MSA explant, the changes in the sizing technique and crura repair over the years, the technique of explant, and the clinical outcomes of the revisional procedure were reviewed.Results: Out of 397 consecutive patients, 50 (12.4%) underwent MSA removal, with a median time to explant of 39.5 [IQR = 53.7] months. Main symptoms leading to removal were dysphagia (43.2%), heartburn (25%), and epigastric pain (13.6%). Erosion occurred in 2.5% of patients. Smaller (12- and 13-bead) devices were the ones most frequently explanted. The majority of the explants were performed laparoscopically with endoscopic assistance. There was no perioperative morbidity, and the median length of stay was 2.8 +/- 1.4 days. After 2014, changes in sizing technique and crura repair resulted in a decreased incidence of explants from 23% to 5% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the protective role of added bead units [HR 0.06 (95% CI = 0.001-0.220); p < 0.000].Conclusion: Oversizing and full mediastinal dissection with posterior hiatoplasty may improve the outcomes of the MSA procedure and possibly reduce removal rates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY
    Tsai, C.
    Kessler, U.
    Steffen, R.
    Zehetner, J.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 : 359 - 359
  • [42] The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment pathway: the gastroenterology perspective
    Patel, Amit
    Gyawali, C. Prakash
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36
  • [43] Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation as a Novel Approach to Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    John P. Kuckelman
    Cody J. Phillips
    Michael J. Derickson
    Byron J. Faler
    Matthew J. Martin
    Obesity Surgery, 2018, 28 : 3080 - 3086
  • [44] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review
    Cammarata, Francesco
    Novia, Martina
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Damiani, Riccardo
    Manara, Michele
    Giovanelli, Alessandro
    Berta, Rossana Daniela
    Anselmino, Marco
    Ogliari, Cristina
    Bona, Davide
    Bonavina, Luigi
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (11) : 4232 - 4243
  • [45] "The missing LINX" for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Operative techniques video for the Linx magnetic sphincter augmentation procedure
    Kuckelman, John P.
    Barron, Morgan R.
    Martin, Matthew J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 213 (05): : 984 - 987
  • [46] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Is Safe and Effective for the Long-Term Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
    Ganz, Robert A.
    Bonavina, Luigi
    DeMeester, Tom R.
    Dunn, Daniel H.
    Lipham, John C.
    Saino, Greta
    Bona, Davide
    Fockens, Paul
    Bemelman, Willem
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A739 - A739
  • [47] Magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhuang, Qian Jun
    Tan, Nian Di
    Chen, Song Feng
    Zhang, Meng Yu
    Xiao, Ying Lian
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2021, 22 (12) : 695 - 705
  • [48] Feasibility and Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity
    Leena Khaitan
    Michael Hill
    Michael Michel
    Patrick Chiasson
    Philip Woodworth
    Reginald Bell
    Ragui Sadek
    Aaron Hoffman
    Kari Loing
    Paula Veldhuis
    William Petraiuolo
    Carlos Anciano
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 387 - 396
  • [49] Novel Surgical Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Systematic Review of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Electric Stimulation Therapy
    Stanak, Michal
    Erdos, Judit
    Hawlik, Katharina
    Birsan, Tudor
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (03) : 161 - 173
  • [50] Feasibility and Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity
    Khaitan, Leena
    Hill, Michael
    Michel, Michael
    Chiasson, Patrick
    Woodworth, Philip
    Bell, Reginald
    Sadek, Ragui
    Hoffman, Aaron
    Loing, Kari
    Veldhuis, Paula
    Petraiuolo, William
    Anciano, Carlos
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (01) : 387 - 396