Non-Selective Beta-Blockers and Risk of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis and Ascites: Results from a Large Observational Study

被引:3
|
作者
Jensen, Morten Daniel [1 ,3 ]
Watson, Hugh [1 ,2 ]
Vilstrup, Hendrik [1 ]
Jepsen, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Hepatol & Gastroenterol, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Evotec ID Lyon, Lyon, France
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Hepatol & Gastroenterol, Entrance C,Plan 1,Intersect C116,Palle Juul Jensen, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
来源
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2023年 / 15卷
关键词
non-selective beta-blockers; NSBB; infection; decompensated; time-dependent; treatment; DEFINITIONS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.2147/CLEP.S400399
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Previous studies have not been able to determine whether non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) reduce the risk of sepsis in cirrhosis. We aimed to examine this question with data from 1198 patients with cirrhosis and ascites included in clinical studies of satavaptan, a vasopressin receptor antagonist with no effect on infection risk.Methods: Risk of sepsis was estimated for NSBB users vs nonusers. Patients were examined every four weeks, or in relation to hospitalization, for the one-year duration of the trials. We computed the cumulative risk of sepsis for patients who did vs did not use NSBB at baseline. We used Cox regression to compare hazard rates of sepsis between current users and nonusers, accounting for changes in NSBB use over time. We adjusted for patient sex and age, MELD-Na score, albumin, use of antibiotics, use of proton pump inhibitors, cirrhosis etiology, history of variceal bleeding or SBP, severity of ascites and HE, HCC, other cancers, and diabetes, while stratifying on geographical region.Results: Of the 1198 patients, 54% used NSBB at some time. There were 56 sepsis episodes. The 1-year risk of sepsis was reduced to 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-8.6) in baseline NSBB users vs 11.6% (95% CI 7.0-15.9) in baseline nonusers. The hazard ratio of sepsis for current NSBB users vs current nonusers was reduced to 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.8) and after adjustment to 0.7 (95% CI 0.4-1.3). Conclusion: NSBB use may reduce the risk of sepsis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, but the precision of the estimate was limited by the number of episodes of sepsis.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 783
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-selective beta-blockers and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis
    He, Xinyi
    Zhao, Zimo
    Jiang, Xi
    Sun, Yan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [22] Treatment of refractory ascites: Current strategies and new landscape of non-selective beta-blockers
    Gonzalez, David Vidal
    Lopez, Karla Paola Perez
    Nungaray, Sail Andre Vera
    Madrigal, Luis Guillermo Moreno
    GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA, 2022, 45 (09): : 715 - 723
  • [23] Longitudinal outcomes of the application of non-selective beta-blockers in portal hypertension: Are low-dose non-selective beta-blockers effective?
    Kang, S. H.
    Kim, M. Y.
    Jang, Y. O.
    Lee, M.
    Jun, B. G.
    Kim, T. -S.
    Suk, K. T.
    Baik, S. K.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : S696 - S696
  • [24] Treatment with non-selective beta-blockers affects the systemic inflammatory response to bacterial DNA in patients with cirrhosis
    Gimenez, Paula
    Garcia-Martinez, Irma
    Frances, Ruben
    Gonzalez-Navajas, Jose M.
    Mauri, Montserrat
    Alfayate, Rocio
    Almenara, Susana
    Miralles, Cayetano
    Palazon, Jose M.
    Carnicer, Fernando
    Pascual, Sonia
    Such, Jose
    Horga, Jose F.
    Zapater, Pedro
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 38 (12) : 2219 - 2227
  • [25] The prognostic value of HVPG-response to non-selective beta-blockers in patients with NASH cirrhosis and varices
    Paternostro, Rafael
    Becker, Jeannette
    Hofer, Benedikt Silvester
    Panagl, Vera
    Schiffke, Helena
    Simbrunner, Benedikt
    Semmler, Georg
    Schwabl, Philipp
    Scheiner, Bernhard
    Bucsics, Theresa
    Bauer, David
    Binter, Teresa
    Trauner, Michael
    Mandorfer, Mattias
    Reiberger, Thomas
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2022, 54 (04) : 500 - 508
  • [26] THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF HVPG-RESPONSE TO NON-SELECTIVE BETA-BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH NASH CIRRHOSIS AND VARICES
    Paternostro, Rafael
    Becker, Jeannette
    Hofer, Benedikt
    Panagl, Vera
    Schiffke, Helena
    Simbrunner, Benedikt
    Semmler, Georg
    Schwabl, Philipp
    Scheiner, Bernhard
    Bucsics, Theresa
    Bauer, David
    Binter, Teresa
    Trauner, Michael H.
    Mandorfer, Mattias
    Reiberger, Thomas
    HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 : 100A - 101A
  • [27] Primary Prophylaxis With Non-Selective Beta-Blockers in Patients With Cirrhosis-A Chasm Between Efficacy and Effectiveness
    Shukla, Richa
    Kramer, Jennifer R.
    Tansel, Aylin
    Natarajan, Yamini
    Ying, Jun
    Walder, Annette M.
    Advani, Shailesh
    El-Serag, Hashem B.
    Kanwal, Fasiha
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S1076 - S1076
  • [28] ATENOLOL AND 3 NON-SELECTIVE BETA-BLOCKERS IN HYPERTENSION
    WAALMANNING, HJ
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1979, 25 (01) : 8 - 18
  • [29] Editorial: Non-selective beta-blockers: A lifesaving shield for critically ill patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis?
    Yang, Ling
    Liu, Chuan
    Lai, Jimmy Che-To
    Qi, Xiaolong
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 60 (07) : 965 - 966
  • [30] Non-selective beta-blockers and acute kidney injury related in decompensated cirrhosis.
    Guerrero Cabrera, Jessica P.
    Lopez Mendez, Eric
    HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 66 : 957A - 957A