Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study

被引:16
|
作者
Sisk, Rose [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Sperrin, Matthew [1 ,3 ]
Peek, Niels [1 ,3 ,4 ]
van Smeden, Maarten [5 ]
Martin, Glen Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, England
[2] Gendius Ltd, Macclesfield, England
[3] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, England
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht Univ, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Vaughan House,Portsmouth St, Manchester, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical prediction model; missing data; imputation; electronic health record; simulation; prediction; VALUES; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1177/09622802231165001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In clinical prediction modelling, missing data can occur at any stage of the model pipeline; development, validation or deployment. Multiple imputation is often recommended yet challenging to apply at deployment; for example, the outcome cannot be in the imputation model, as recommended under multiple imputation. Regression imputation uses a fitted model to impute the predicted value of missing predictors from observed data, and could offer a pragmatic alternative at deployment. Moreover, the use of missing indicators has been proposed to handle informative missingness, but it is currently unknown how well this method performs in the context of clinical prediction models.Methods: We simulated data under various missing data mechanisms to compare the predictive performance of clinical prediction models developed using both imputation methods. We consider deployment scenarios where missing data is permitted or prohibited, imputation models that use or omit the outcome, and clinical prediction models that include or omit missing indicators. We assume that the missingness mechanism remains constant across the model pipeline. We also apply the proposed strategies to critical care data. Results: With complete data available at deployment, our findings were in line with existing recommendations; that the outcome should be used to impute development data when using multiple imputation and omitted under regression imputation. When missingness is allowed at deployment, omitting the outcome from the imputation model at the development was preferred. Missing indicators improved model performance in many cases but can be harmful under outcome-dependent missingness.Conclusion: We provide evidence that commonly taught principles of handling missing data via multiple imputation may not apply to clinical prediction models, particularly when data can be missing at deployment. We observed comparable predictive performance under multiple imputation and regression imputation. The performance of the missing data handling method must be evaluated on a study-by-study basis, and the most appropriate strategy for handling missing data at development should consider whether missing data are allowed at deployment. Some guidance is provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1477
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hot Deck Multiple Imputation for Handling Missing Accelerometer Data
    Nicole M. Butera
    Siying Li
    Kelly R. Evenson
    Chongzhi Di
    David M. Buchner
    Michael J. LaMonte
    Andrea Z. LaCroix
    Amy Herring
    Statistics in Biosciences, 2019, 11 : 422 - 448
  • [22] Novel Missing-Rate-Oriented Selective Algorithm for Handling Missing Data by Minimizing Imputation
    Li, Xing
    Li, Guolin
    Fishbune, Rick
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-ENABLED DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS - CYBERC 2016, 2016, : 234 - 237
  • [23] Handling missing data in clinical research
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    Twisk, Jos W. R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 151 : 185 - 188
  • [24] A new analytical framework for missing data imputation and classification with uncertainty: Missing data imputation and heart failure readmission prediction
    Hu, Zhiyong
    Du, Dongping
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [25] Attempts Prediction by Missing Data Imputation in Engineering Degree
    Jove, Esteban
    Blanco-Rodriguez, Patricia
    Luis Casteleiro-Roca, Jose
    Moreno-Arboleda, Javier
    Antonio Lopez-Vazquez, Jose
    de Cos Juez, Francisco Javier
    Luis Calvo-Rolle, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE SOCO'17- CISIS'17-ICEUTE'17 PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 649 : 167 - 176
  • [26] Handling Missing Exposure: A Simulation Study
    Margulis, Andrea V.
    Arana, Alejandro
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 329 - 329
  • [27] Handling Missing Data in a Duloxetine Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model – Imputation Methods and Selection Models
    Eunice Yuen
    Ivelina Gueorguieva
    Leon Aarons
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 31 : 2829 - 2843
  • [28] Simulation of multinomial probit probabilities and imputation of missing data
    Lavy, V
    Palumbo, M
    Stern, S
    ADVANCES IN ECONOMETRICS, VOL 13 1998, 1998, 13 : 145 - 179
  • [29] Identifiable Generative Models for Missing Not at Random Data Imputation
    Ma, Chao
    Zhang, Cheng
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 34 (NEURIPS 2021), 2021, 34
  • [30] Handling Missing Data in a Duloxetine Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model - Imputation Methods and Selection Models
    Yuen, Eunice
    Gueorguieva, Ivelina
    Aarons, Leon
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 31 (10) : 2829 - 2843