Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It

被引:0
|
作者
Mraz, Alexis L. [1 ]
Mutyala, Nandini [1 ,2 ]
Cleary, Seana [1 ,3 ]
Seals, Brenda F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll New Jersey, Sch Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Ewing Township, NJ 08618 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Gangarosa Dept Environm Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA); dairy farms; cryptosporidiosis; personal protective equipment (PPE); zoonotic diseases; Cryptosporidium parvum; TIME; OOCYSTS; PARVUM; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms11102413
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Cows are known carriers of Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), a protozoa that can cause the gastrointestinal illness cryptosporidiosis in humans. Despite this potential exposure, dairy farmers tend to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect the milk from contamination, rather than to protect themselves from zoonotic diseases, such as cryptosporidiosis. In this study, cow feces were collected from individual cattle on dairy farms and analyzed for C. parvum using qPCR. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) was used to determine the risk of cryptosporidiosis to the dairy farmer with and without the use of handwashing and PPE (gloves and masks). The annualized risk of cryptosporidiosis to dairy farmers was 29.08% but was reduced significantly in each of the three interventions. Among the individual interventions, glove use provided the greatest reduction in risk, bringing the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 4.82%. Implementing regular handwashing, the use of gloves and a mask brought the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 1.29%. This study provides evidence that handwashing and PPE use can significantly reduce the risk of cryptosporidiosis to farmers and is worth implementing despite potential barriers such as discomfort and cost.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comfort of personal protective equipment
    Appl Ergon, 3 (195):
  • [22] PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR EMPLOYEES
    CORNWELLSMITH, N
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6851): : 474 - 475
  • [23] Assessment of personal protective equipment use among Midwestern farmers
    Carpenter, WS
    Lee, BC
    Gunderson, PD
    Stueland, DT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2002, 42 (03) : 236 - 247
  • [24] HOW PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AFFECTS PERCEPTIONS OF DENTISTS
    GLAROS, AG
    GADBURYAMYOT, CC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 124 (10): : 82 - &
  • [25] Farmers’ health risk and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during pesticide application
    Mojtaba Sookhtanlou
    Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 28168 - 28178
  • [26] Farmers' health risk and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during pesticide application
    Sookhtanlou, Mojtaba
    Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (22) : 28168 - 28178
  • [27] When to Replace Personal Protective Equipment
    Doan, Daniel R.
    IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2021, 27 (03) : 7 - +
  • [28] PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR EMPLOYEES IN INDUSTRY
    不详
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1965, 10 (04): : 663 - 673
  • [29] Definition of personal protective equipment (PPE)
    Burlingame, Byron L.
    AORN JOURNAL, 2016, 104 (01) : 76 - 77
  • [30] Decontamination and the use of personal protective equipment
    Scarfone, Richard J.
    Sullivan, Frank J.
    Henretig, Fred M.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2006, 22 (06) : 445 - 452