Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It

被引:0
|
作者
Mraz, Alexis L. [1 ]
Mutyala, Nandini [1 ,2 ]
Cleary, Seana [1 ,3 ]
Seals, Brenda F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll New Jersey, Sch Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Ewing Township, NJ 08618 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Gangarosa Dept Environm Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA); dairy farms; cryptosporidiosis; personal protective equipment (PPE); zoonotic diseases; Cryptosporidium parvum; TIME; OOCYSTS; PARVUM; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms11102413
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Cows are known carriers of Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), a protozoa that can cause the gastrointestinal illness cryptosporidiosis in humans. Despite this potential exposure, dairy farmers tend to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect the milk from contamination, rather than to protect themselves from zoonotic diseases, such as cryptosporidiosis. In this study, cow feces were collected from individual cattle on dairy farms and analyzed for C. parvum using qPCR. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) was used to determine the risk of cryptosporidiosis to the dairy farmer with and without the use of handwashing and PPE (gloves and masks). The annualized risk of cryptosporidiosis to dairy farmers was 29.08% but was reduced significantly in each of the three interventions. Among the individual interventions, glove use provided the greatest reduction in risk, bringing the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 4.82%. Implementing regular handwashing, the use of gloves and a mask brought the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 1.29%. This study provides evidence that handwashing and PPE use can significantly reduce the risk of cryptosporidiosis to farmers and is worth implementing despite potential barriers such as discomfort and cost.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    LISTER, P
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1993, (15) : 595 - 595
  • [2] PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    不详
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1986, 28 (02) : 71 - 72
  • [3] PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    SCHEEL, P
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1993, 205 : 12 - CHAS
  • [4] PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    Mills, Georgina
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2021, 189 (05) : 183 - 183
  • [5] Personal Protective Equipment
    Opflow, 1976, 2 (05):
  • [6] PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    FANNING, B
    NORTH DAKOTA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE CIRCULAR, 1981, (NAE-4): : 1 - 4
  • [7] Personal protective equipment
    Johnstone, Esther M.
    AORN JOURNAL, 2017, 106 (01) : 73 - 74
  • [8] MISSING: PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    Flynn, Katherine E.
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2014, 92 (46) : 2 - 2
  • [9] Personal Protective Equipment: Comment
    Johnstone, Robert E.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 135 (04) : 763 - 764
  • [10] Notes on personal protective equipment
    Parker, Kevin
    Cohen, Gary
    Vavra, Chris
    Pelliccione, Amanda
    Smith, Michael
    Bak, Susie
    Floyd, H. Landis
    Glenski, John
    Isenhour, Shon
    Lin, Shi-Wan
    Malinowski, John
    Skelton, David
    Taylor, Billy Ray
    Turner, Larry
    Watson, Mark
    Plant Engineering, 2022, 76 (01)