Multifidelity aerodynamic shape optimization for airfoil dynamic stall mitigation using manifold mapping

被引:0
|
作者
Raul, Vishal [1 ]
Leifsson, Leifur [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Dynamic stall; Aerodynamic shape optimization; Multifidelity modeling; Manifold mapping; Kriging-and Cokriging-regression; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; TURBULENCE MODELS; DESIGN; CONVERGENCE; SINGLE; ONSET; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102213
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Aerodynamic shape optimization for dynamic stall mitigation is computationally challenging, requiring multiple costly CFD evaluations. This work proposes a multifidelity modeling technique to efficiently mitigate dynamic stall over an airfoil, particularly manifold mapping (MM) within a trust-region-based optimization framework to find an optimal shape defined by six PARSEC parameters. The high-fidelity (HF) responses are modeled using the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with Menter's shear stress transport turbulence model at a Reynolds number of 135,000, Mach number of 0.1, and reduced frequency of 0.05. The low-fidelity responses are acquired from the Kriging regression (KR) trained over the design space. The MM with the pattern-search algorithm is utilized to find optimal designs in two different test cases. The result yields two distinct optimal shapes with a higher thickness, larger leading-edge radius, and more aft camber than the baseline airfoil (NACA 0012), indicating the presence of multiple valid designs. Both designs delay the dynamic stall angle over 3 deg while mitigating peak lift and pitching moment magnitudes. The current approach delivers a computational saving of over 70% compared to HF -KR and Cokriging regression techniques. These findings present an efficient multifidelity strategy with potential application to other computationally expensive optimization problems.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Design of a morphing airfoil using aerodynamic shape optimization
    Secanell, M.
    Suleman, A.
    Gamboa, P.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (07) : 1550 - 1562
  • [12] Airfoil shape design and optimization using multifidelity analysis and embedded inverse design
    Barrett, Thomas R.
    Bressloff, Neil W.
    Keane, Andy J.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (09) : 2051 - 2060
  • [13] Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Delaying Dynamic Stall of Airfoils by Regression Kriging
    Raul, Vishal
    Leifsson, Leifur
    Koziel, Slawomir
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2020, PT V, 2020, 12141 : 57 - 70
  • [14] Supersonic Airfoil Shape Optimization by Variable-Fidelity Models and Manifold Mapping
    Siegler, Jacob
    Ren, Jie
    Leifsson, Leifur
    Koziel, Slawomir
    Bekasiewicz, Adrian
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE 2016 (ICCS 2016), 2016, 80 : 1103 - 1113
  • [15] Aerodynamic Optimization Design of Airfoil Shape Using Entropy Generation as an Objective
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Jun
    Yang, Xiao-Pei
    Ding, Yan-Yan
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [16] AERODYNAMIC LOADING ON A 2-DIMENSIONAL AIRFOIL DURING DYNAMIC STALL
    HAM, ND
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1968, 6 (10) : 1927 - &
  • [17] Manifold Learning for Aerodynamic Shape Design Optimization
    Zheng, Boda
    Moni, Abhijith
    Yao, Weigang
    Xu, Min
    AEROSPACE, 2025, 12 (03)
  • [18] Airfoil Separation Constraint Formulation for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization
    Abdul-Kaiyoom, Mohamed Arshath Saja
    Yildirim, Anil
    Gray, Alasdair C.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2025, 62 (01): : 48 - 61
  • [19] Characterization of aeroelastic response and aerodynamic stiffness effect of an airfoil in the presence of dynamic stall
    Zhan Qiu
    Fuxin Wang
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2023, 111 : 129 - 154
  • [20] Aerodynamic modeling of wind turbine airfoil concerning dynamic stall and Gurney flap
    Yang, Junwei
    Yang, Hua
    Wang, Xiangjun
    ACTA MECHANICA SINICA, 2023, 39 (09)