Enhancing Strategic Planning of Projects: Selecting the Right Product Development Methodology

被引:0
|
作者
Lishner, Itai [1 ]
Shtub, Avraham [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Data & Decis Sci, IL-320003 Haifa, Israel
关键词
systems engineering; methodologies; project management; modeling and simulation; system dynamics; agile; waterfall; SOFTWARE PROCESS SIMULATION; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; GOVERNANCE; SUCCESS; ABSENCE; WORK;
D O I
10.3390/info14120632
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The selection of an appropriate development methodology is a critical strategic decision when managing a New Product Development (NPD) project. However, accurately estimating project duration based on the chosen methodology remains a challenge. This paper addresses the limitations of existing models and proposes a novel NPD project model that allows for testing and evaluation of different product development strategies. The model considers Waterfall, Spiral, Agile, and Hybrid methodologies and provides system engineers and project managers with decision-making tools to determine the optimal strategy and understand associated tradeoffs. The model is validated using real projects from various organizations and methodologies. It incorporates stochastic variables, risk management, and dynamic resource allocation, while addressing both Waterfall and Agile methodologies. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by offering practical tools for system engineers and project managers for choosing development methodology, improving project duration estimation, and identifying critical processes and risks in NPD projects. The research results also provide a basis for further studies and can benefit researchers interested in systems engineering methodologies. The proposed model fills a gap in the literature by providing a validated NPD model to evaluate the impact of different product development methodologies on project duration.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Team based labour assignment methodology for now product development projects
    Baysan, Serdar
    Durmusoglu, M. Bulent
    Cinar, Didem
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 106 : 83 - 104
  • [32] STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVE ON PRODUCT PLANNING
    DAY, GS
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS, 1975, 4 (02): : 1 - 34
  • [33] A Methodology for Value-oriented Strategic Release Planning to Provide Continuous Product Upgrading
    Sahin, T.
    Huth, T.
    Axmann, J.
    Vietor, T.
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM), 2020, : 1032 - 1036
  • [34] A risk oriented model to assess strategic decisions in new product development projects
    Marmier, F.
    Gourc, D.
    Laarz, F.
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2013, 56 : 74 - 82
  • [35] A methodology for selecting portfolios of projects with interactions and under uncertainty
    Ghapanchi, Amir Hossein
    Tavana, Madjid
    Khakbaz, Mohammad Hossein
    Low, Graham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2012, 30 (07) : 791 - 803
  • [36] Strategic product planning -: A case study exploring the process and its development
    Sidén, J
    Lindström, P
    Pauli, AM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE: DESIGN 2000, 2000, : 49 - 54
  • [37] Selecting sustainable infrastructure projects-a qualitative approach to selecting the right project
    Bates, Wayne E.
    Journal of New England Water Environment Association, 1600, 55 (02): : 20 - 27
  • [38] Strategic planning in universities: an innovative methodology
    Serrano Cardenas, Lizeth
    Bravo Ibarra, Edna
    Amante Garcia, Beatriz
    INGE CUC, 2013, 9 (01) : 43 - 63
  • [39] Methodology for sustainability strategic planning and management
    Leon-Soriano, Raul
    Jesus Munoz-Torres, Maria
    Chalmeta-Rosalen, Ricardo
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2010, 110 (1-2) : 249 - 268
  • [40] Toward a Novel Methodology for IT Strategic Planning
    Lakhdissi, Mouhsine
    Bounabat, Bouchaib
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2011, : 263 - 273