Liquidity difference between non-US and US IPOs on the NYSE listings

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jang-Chul [1 ]
Lee, Kaun Y. [2 ]
Yi, Ha-Chin [3 ]
机构
[1] Northern Kentucky Univ, Haile Coll Business, Dept Accounting Econ & Finance, Highland Hts, KY 41099 USA
[2] Chung Ang Univ, CAU Business Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Texas State Univ, McCoy Coll Business Adm, Dept Finance & Econ, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
关键词
Liquidity; Information asymmetry; Non-US IPO; Spreads; Country risk; Institutional quality; G12; G15; CROSS-LISTINGS; MARKETS; IMPACT; TRUST; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-023-01204-w
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate liquidity and information asymmetry for a sample of non-U.S. stock listings and U.S. IPO listings on the NYSE. We find that non-U.S. stock listings tend to have wider spreads, larger price impact of trades, and higher probability of information-based trading than those of the U.S. IPOs. In addition, our results show that the differences in liquidity and information asymmetry are not transient; it has a long-term implication. Furthermore, liquidity and information asymmetry measures for non-U.S. stock listings are significantly related to the macro-institutional quality of their home countries such as political risk and absence of violence/terrorism, government effectiveness, voice and accountability, control of corruption, and rule of law. We find that non-U.S. stocks from countries with lower institutional quality metrics tend to have lower liquidity and higher information asymmetry. Therefore, improving a country's institutional quality alleviates information problems and improves market liquidity for non-U.S. stocks listed in NYSE.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 387
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-Us Citizens Donate More Organs For Lung Transplant Than Are Transplanted Into Non-Us Citizens
    Towe, C.
    Zafar, F.
    Khan, M. S.
    Johnson, J.
    Bryant, R.
    Morales, D. L. S.
    Schecter, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [22] GUSTO-IIb: Comparison of US and non-US patients
    Aylward, PE
    Vahanian, A
    Bonny, TM
    Simoons, ML
    Armstrong, PW
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 159 - 159
  • [23] Empire defanged? Non-US perspectives on US foreign policy
    Heine, Jorge
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2007, 28 (05) : 531 - 543
  • [24] NON-US ENGINEERS BENEFIT THE INDUSTRY
    PANSARE, M
    EDN, 1989, 34 (15) : 35 - 35
  • [25] FDA SEND in non-US countries responses to the standard for exchange of nonclinical data (SEND) in non-US countries
    Anzai, T.
    Kaufman, L.
    Aerni, R.
    Mura, F.
    Schuster, M.
    Buchanan, R.
    Wasko, M.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 238 (02) : S165 - S165
  • [26] Living kidney donor informed consent practices vary between US and non-US centers
    Parekh, Ami M.
    Gordon, Elisa J.
    Garg, Amit X.
    Waterman, Amy D.
    Kulkarni, Sanjay
    Parikh, Chirag R.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 23 (10) : 3316 - 3324
  • [27] Liver Allocation to Non-US Citizen Non-US Residents: An Ethical Framework for a Last-in-Line Approach
    Hartsock, J. A.
    Ivy, S. S.
    Helft, P. R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (06) : 1681 - 1687
  • [28] Accounting choice, homes bias, and US investment in non-US firms
    Bradshaw, MT
    Bushee, BJ
    Miller, GS
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (05) : 795 - 841
  • [29] Lay Perceptions of Selection Decision Aids in US and Non-US Samples
    Diab, Dalia L.
    Pui, Shuang-Yueh
    Yankelevich, Maya
    Highhouse, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 19 (02) : 209 - 216
  • [30] The Long Arm of the Law: The Availability of US Discovery in Non-US Cases
    Boyle, Nicholas J.
    CIVIL JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2010, 29 (01): : 73 - 93