Midblock Pedestrian Signal Safety Effectiveness

被引:1
|
作者
Fitzpatrick, Kay [1 ]
Geedipally, Srinivas [2 ]
Kutela, Boniphace [1 ]
Koonce, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Transportat Inst, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Transportat Inst, Arlington, TX USA
[3] Peter Koonce Consulting, Portland, OR USA
关键词
crash modification factor; intersection design and control strategies; pedestrian and cyclist safety;
D O I
10.1177/03611981231184196
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The midblock pedestrian signal (MPS) operates as a coordinated actuated vehicular traffic signal that enables pedestrians to cross at midblock. The MPS has been used in multiple locations, including for more than 40 years in Los Angeles. It differs from a typical pedestrian crossing signal by allowing the red display for vehicular traffic to flash at the same time as the pedestrian timing for the crossing, reducing delay to vehicular traffic. The research team built a database of crash and roadway characteristics data for treated and control sites located in three states (California, Utah, and Texas). Three control groups were considered: all control sites (included intersections with two, three, or four legs and traffic control signals); two-leg sites with any type of pedestrian traffic control other than the MPS; and two-leg sites with nonactive or not present pedestrian traffic control devices. It was found that the MPS is associated with a reduction in the number of crashes involving pedestrians and a reduction in the number of all fatal and injury crashes when the control group is two-leg sites with nonactive or not present pedestrian traffic control devices. The following crash modification factors for the MPS were identified: 0.554 for crashes involving pedestrians; and 0.660 for all crashes.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 256
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching pedestrian safety
    McComas, J
    MacKay, M
    Pivik, J
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2002, 5 (03): : 185 - 190
  • [32] Safety Effectiveness of HAWK Pedestrian Treatment DISCUSSION
    Shanteau, Robert
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2140) : 222 - 223
  • [33] Individual differences of pedestrian behaviour in midblock crosswalk and intersection
    Wang, Wuhong
    Guo, Hongwei
    Gao, Ziyou
    Bubb, Heiner
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS, 2011, 16 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [34] Control Strategy for Vehicular and Pedestrian Midblock Crossing Movements
    Hunsanon, Thodsapon
    Kronprasert, Nopadon
    Upayokin, Auttawit
    Songchitruksa, Praprut
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH - WCTR 2016, 2017, 25 : 1675 - 1692
  • [35] Influence of Midblock Pedestrian Crossings on Urban Street Capacity
    Bak, Radoslaw
    Kiec, Mariusz
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2316) : 76 - 83
  • [36] Pedestrian risk analysis at uncontrolled midblock and unsignalised intersections
    Ravishankar, Kodavanti Venkata Raghavendra
    Nair, Parvathy Maheswari
    JOURNAL OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ENGLISH EDITION, 2018, 5 (02) : 137 - 147
  • [37] Estimating Pedestrian Crossing Volumes and Crashes at Midblock Locations
    Reddy Geedipally, Srinivas
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, 2676 (08) : 648 - 656
  • [38] Modelling the pedestrian dilemma zone at uncontrolled midblock sections
    Pawar, Digvijay S.
    Yadav, Ankit Kumar
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2022, 80 : 87 - 96
  • [39] Pedestrian safety analysis at urban midblock section under mixed traffic conditions using time to collision as surrogate safety measure
    Golakiya H.
    Chauhan R.
    Bari C.S.
    Dhamaniya A.
    Current Science, 2022, 123 (09): : 1117 - 1128
  • [40] Exploring pedestrian surrogate safety measures by road geometry at midblock crosswalks: A perspective under mixed traffic conditions
    Chaudhari, Avinash
    Gore, Ninad
    Arkatkar, Shriniwas
    Joshi, Gaurang
    Pulugurtha, Srinivas
    IATSS RESEARCH, 2021, 45 (01) : 87 - 101