Risk-informed decision-making and control strategies for autonomous vehicles in emergency situations

被引:11
|
作者
Nguyen, Hung Duy [1 ,3 ]
Choi, Mooryong [2 ]
Han, Kyoungseok [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Daegu 41566, South Korea
[2] Nmotion Co, Incheon 21984, South Korea
[3] TU Wien, Automat & Control Inst ACIN, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
来源
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Autonomous vehicle; Collision avoidance; Decision-making; Finite state machine; Model predictive control; Optimal path planning; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; DYNAMICS CONTROL; ALGORITHM; DESIGN; MPC;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2023.107305
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
This paper proposes risk-informed decision-making and control methods for autonomous vehicles (AVs) under severe driving conditions, where many vehicle interactions occur on slippery roads. We assume that the AV should approach a specific safe zone in case of vehicle malfunctioning. In normal situations, the driving behavior of the AV is based on the deterministic finite-state machine (FSM) that makes an appropriate realtime decision depending on the driving condition, which is efficient when compared with some conventional decision-making algorithms; alternatively, in emergency situations, the AV first has to be prevented the rear end conflicts while the specific safe zone is simultaneously determined by evaluating the level of risk via two safety level indicators, i.e., Time-To-Collision (TTC) and Deceleration Rate to Avoid the Crash (DRAC). The safe path that guides the AV to avoid car crashes is generated based on the trajectory optimization theory (i.e., Pontryagin maximum principle), and the AV follows it based on the linear time-varying model predictive control (LTV-MPC), which ensures the AV's lateral stability. We verify the effectiveness of the proposed decision-making and control strategies in various test scenarios, and the results show that the AV behaves appropriately according to the behaviors of surrounding vehicles and road condition.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adapted principles of risk-informed decision-making for new nuclear power plants
    Cepin, M.
    RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 349 - 352
  • [22] Risk-informed longitudinal control in autonomous vehicles: A safety potential field modeling approach
    Shao, Yichang
    Han, Zhongyi
    Shi, Xiaomeng
    Zhang, Yuhan
    Ye, Zhirui
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2024, 633
  • [23] Risk-informed longitudinal control in autonomous vehicles: A safety potential field modeling approach
    Shao, Yichang
    Han, Zhongyi
    Shi, Xiaomeng
    Zhang, Yuhan
    Ye, Zhirui
    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2024, 633
  • [24] Including model uncertainty in risk-informed decision making
    Reinert, JM
    Apostolakis, GE
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2006, 33 (04) : 354 - 369
  • [25] Planning and Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles
    Schwarting, Wilko
    Alonso-Mora, Javier
    Rus, Daniela
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL, ROBOTICS, AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, VOL 1, 2018, 1 : 187 - 210
  • [26] An Overview of Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicles
    Ghraizi, Dany
    Talj, Reine
    Francis, Clovis
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02):
  • [27] A new importance measure for risk-informed decision making
    Borgonovo, E
    Apostolakis, GE
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 2467 - 2472
  • [28] A new importance measure for risk-informed decision making
    Borgonovo, E
    Apostolakis, GE
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 72 (02) : 193 - 212
  • [29] Sustaining risk-informed decision making (RIDM) measures
    Arulanantham, R
    Feldman, L
    ECOSYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IV, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, 18-19 : 539 - 547
  • [30] Development of a regulatory framework for risk-informed decision making
    Jang, Dong Ju
    Shim, Hyung Jin
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 52 (01) : 69 - 77