Risk-informed decision-making and control strategies for autonomous vehicles in emergency situations

被引:11
|
作者
Nguyen, Hung Duy [1 ,3 ]
Choi, Mooryong [2 ]
Han, Kyoungseok [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Daegu 41566, South Korea
[2] Nmotion Co, Incheon 21984, South Korea
[3] TU Wien, Automat & Control Inst ACIN, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
来源
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Autonomous vehicle; Collision avoidance; Decision-making; Finite state machine; Model predictive control; Optimal path planning; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; DYNAMICS CONTROL; ALGORITHM; DESIGN; MPC;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2023.107305
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
This paper proposes risk-informed decision-making and control methods for autonomous vehicles (AVs) under severe driving conditions, where many vehicle interactions occur on slippery roads. We assume that the AV should approach a specific safe zone in case of vehicle malfunctioning. In normal situations, the driving behavior of the AV is based on the deterministic finite-state machine (FSM) that makes an appropriate realtime decision depending on the driving condition, which is efficient when compared with some conventional decision-making algorithms; alternatively, in emergency situations, the AV first has to be prevented the rear end conflicts while the specific safe zone is simultaneously determined by evaluating the level of risk via two safety level indicators, i.e., Time-To-Collision (TTC) and Deceleration Rate to Avoid the Crash (DRAC). The safe path that guides the AV to avoid car crashes is generated based on the trajectory optimization theory (i.e., Pontryagin maximum principle), and the AV follows it based on the linear time-varying model predictive control (LTV-MPC), which ensures the AV's lateral stability. We verify the effectiveness of the proposed decision-making and control strategies in various test scenarios, and the results show that the AV behaves appropriately according to the behaviors of surrounding vehicles and road condition.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPING RISK-INFORMED DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
    Paivinen, Minna
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2016, 22 : A129 - A130
  • [2] Risk-informed multi-objective decision-making of emergency schemes optimization
    Liu, Xuan
    Wang, Cheng
    Yin, Zhiming
    An, Xu
    Meng, Huixing
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 245
  • [3] Risk-informed control systems for improved operational performance and decision-making
    Thieme, Christoph A.
    Rokseth, Borge
    Utne, Ingrid B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2023, 237 (02) : 332 - 354
  • [4] Risk-informed decision-making in the presence of epistemic uncertainty
    Dubois, Didier
    Guyonnet, Dominique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 40 (02) : 145 - 167
  • [5] risk-INFORMED DECISION MAKING
    Ayyub, Bilal M.
    Prassinos, Peter G.
    Etherton, John
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 132 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [6] Heat Stress Monitoring in Construction for Risk-Informed Decision-Making
    Kim, Yoojun
    Ham, Youngjib
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, AUTOMATION, AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 70 - 78
  • [7] A decision-making methodology for risk-informed earthquake early warning
    Cremen, Gemma
    Galasso, Carmine
    COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2021, 36 (06) : 747 - 761
  • [8] Risk-informed decision-making related to the on-line maintenance
    Cepin, Marko
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2011, 241 (04) : 1114 - 1118
  • [9] Developments in risk-informed decision-making for nuclear power plants
    Vesely, WE
    Apostolakis, GE
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1999, 63 (03) : 223 - 224
  • [10] Developing a framework on school resilience for risk-informed decision-making
    Nakum, Vipul Kumar
    Ahamed, Muhammed Sulfikkar
    Isetani, Saki
    Chatterjee, Ranit
    Shaw, Rajib
    Soma, Hanae
    PROGRESS IN DISASTER SCIENCE, 2022, 15