Estimation of 3T MR Images from 1.5T Images Regularized with Physics Based Constraint

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Prabhjot [1 ]
Minhas, Atul Singh [2 ]
Ahuja, Chirag Kamal [3 ]
Sao, Anil Kumar [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Prades, India
[2] Magnetica, Northgate, Australia
[3] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Chandigarh, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol Bhilai, Bhilai, India
关键词
Low field MRI; 0.25T; 1.5T; 3T; T1 relaxation times; Optimization;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-43999-5_13
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Limited accessibility to high field MRI scanners (such as 7T, 11T) has motivated the development of post-processing methods to improve low field images. Several existing post-processing methods have shown the feasibility to improve 3T images to produce 7T-like images [3,18]. It has been observed that improving lower field (LF, <= 1.5T) images comes with additional challenges due to poor image quality such as the function mapping 1.5T and higher field (HF, 3T) images is more complex than the function relating 3T and 7T images [10]. Except for [10], no method has been addressed to improve <= 1.5T MRI images. Further, most of the existing methods [3,18] including [10] require example images, and also often rely on pixel to pixel correspondences between LF and HF images which are usually inaccurate for <= 1.5T images. The focus of this paper is to address the unsupervised framework for quality improvement of 1.5T images and avoid the expensive requirements of example images and associated image registration. The LF and HF images are assumed to be related by a linear transformation (LT). The unknown HF image and unknown LT are estimated in alternate minimization framework. Further, a physics based constraint is proposed that provides an additional non-linear function relating LF and HF images in order to achieve the desired high contrast in estimated HF image. This constraint exploits the fact that the T1 relaxation time of tissues increases with increase in field strength, and if it is incorporated in the LF acquisition the HF contrast can be simulated. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach provides processed 1.5T images, i.e., estimated 3T-like images with improved image quality, and is comparably better than the existing methods addressing similar problems. The improvement in image quality is also shown to provide better tissue segmentation and volume quantification as compared to scanner acquired 1.5T images. The same set of experiments have also been conducted for 0.25T images to estimate 1.5T images, and demonstrate the advantages of proposed work.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 141
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DIFFERENCES IN QUANTITATIVE MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION MAPPING BY CMR AT 1.5T AND 3T
    Javed, Wasim
    Goh, Z.
    Shabi, M.
    Sharrack, N.
    Gorecka, M.
    Levelt, E.
    Xue, H.
    Dall'Armellina, E.
    Kellman, P.
    Greenwood, J. P.
    Plein, S.
    Swoboda, P. P.
    HEART, 2023, 109 (SUPPL_1) : A16 - A16
  • [32] Towards MR-based treatment planning: Characterisation of geometric distortion in 3T MR images
    Baldwin, L
    Wachowicz, K
    Fallone, B
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (07) : 2424 - 2424
  • [33] A Quantification of Image Artefacts Arising From Prostate Fidicual Markers on 1.5 and 3T Diffusion-weighted MR Images
    Rylander, S.
    Thornqvist, S.
    Haack, S.
    Pedersen, E. M.
    Muren, L. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S192 - S192
  • [34] No Increased Mercury Release from Dental Restorations at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T MRI
    Burkett, Brian J.
    Rasmussen, Chad M.
    Fillmore, W. Jonathan
    McDonald, Jennifer S.
    McDonald, Robert J.
    Fagan, Andrew J.
    Erdahl, Sarah A.
    Eckdahl, Steven J.
    Welker, Kirk M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2024, 91 (02) : 660 - 669
  • [35] Monitoring of gustatory stimulation of salivary glands by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Comparison of 1.5T and 3T
    Habermann, C. R.
    Gossrau, P.
    Kooijman, H.
    Graessner, J.
    Cramer, M. C.
    Kaul, M. G.
    Reitmeier, F.
    Jaehne, M.
    Adam, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2007, 28 (08) : 1547 - 1551
  • [36] Introducer Needles of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Assessment of Magnetic Field Interactions with 1.5T and 3T MR Systems
    Sakai, Mio
    Aoki, Shigeki
    Watanabe, Yasushi
    Tanabe, Daisaku
    Taga, Takashi
    Inoue, Yusuke
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 8 (04) : 181 - 185
  • [37] Comparison of central vein detection in MS at 1.5T, 3T and 7T
    Fechner, A.
    Savatovsky, J.
    Sadik, J-C.
    Reich, D. S.
    Roux, P.
    Sati, P.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 : 680 - 680
  • [38] Imaging of Meniscal Tear and Cartilage Damage at 1.5T, 3T, and 7T
    Sammet, S.
    Wassenaar, P.
    Zalewski, S.
    Stoez, M.
    Knopp, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (05)
  • [39] Hyperpolarized 129Xe gas transfer MRI: the transition from 1.5T to 3T
    Wang, Ziyi
    He, Mu
    Bier, Elianna
    Rankine, Leith
    Schrank, Geoffry
    Rajagopal, Sudarshan
    Huang, Yuh-Chin
    Kelsey, Christopher
    Womack, Samantha
    Mammarappallil, Joseph
    Driehuys, Bastiaan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (06) : 2374 - 2383
  • [40] INTENSITY PROFILE BASED MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE GOLD MARKER IMPACT ON 1.5T AND 3.0T DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MR IMAGES
    Rylander, S.
    Thornqvist, S.
    Haack, S.
    Pedersen, E. Morre
    Muren, L. P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S179 - S180