A retrospective study on application of a classification criterion based on relative intervertebral tension in spinal fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases

被引:3
|
作者
Hou, Yang [1 ]
Shi, Hongyang [1 ]
Zhao, Tianyi [1 ]
Shi, Haoyang [1 ]
Shi, Jiangang [1 ]
Shi, Guodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 415 Fengyang Rd, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
关键词
Lumbar interbody fusion; Relative intervertebral tension; Fusion rate; Cage migration; Cage subsidence; SUBSIDENCE; CAGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-023-01968-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAs an important part of spinal fusion procedure, the selection of fusion cage size is closely related to the curative effect of the surgery. It mainly depends on the clinical experience of surgeons, and there is still a lack of objective standards. The purpose of this study is to propose the concept of relative intervertebral tension (RIT) for the first time and its grading standards to improve the surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted from January 2018 to July 2019. A total of 83 eligible patients including 45 men and 38 women with lumbar degenerative disease underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) were included in this study. A total of 151 fusion segments were divided into group A, group B and group C according to the grading standards of RIT. In addition, parameters of intervertebral space angle (ISA), intervertebral space height (ISH), intervertebral space foramen (IFH), fusion rates, cage-related complications and cage heights were also compared among the three groups.ResultsThe ISA in group A was the smallest among three groups in contrast with group C with largest ISA at the final follow-up(P < 0.05). The group A presented the smallest ISH and IFH values(P < 0.05), compared with group B with the largest ISH and IFH values(P < 0.05). These two parameters in the group C were in-between. The fusion rates of group A, group B and group C were 100%, 96.3% and 98.8% at the final follow-up, respectively. No statistical difference in fusion rates and cage-related complications occurred among the three groups(P > 0.05), and a certain correlation between ISH and RIT was also observed.ConclusionsThe concept of RIT and the application of its clinical grading standards could simplify the surgical procedures of spinal fusion and reduce cage-related complications.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The influence of body mass index on efficacy and outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective cohort study
    Zhuang, Chenyang
    Xu, Yun
    Lin, Hong
    Gu, Yutong
    BMC SURGERY, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [42] The limited area decompression, intervertebral fusion, and pedicle screw fixation for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with instability Follow-up at least 12 months an observational study
    Yang, Fengguang
    Ren, Enhui
    Yang, Liang
    Wang, Yonggang
    Hu, Xuchang
    Yang, Yong
    Kang, Xuewen
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (50)
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion in L4-5 lumbar degenerative diseases compared with traditional XLIF and OLIF: a retrospective cohort study of 156 cases
    Jiaqi Li
    Yapeng Sun
    Lei Guo
    Fei Zhang
    Wenyuan Ding
    Wei Zhang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion in L4-5 lumbar degenerative diseases compared with traditional XLIF and OLIF: a retrospective cohort study of 156 cases
    Li, Jiaqi
    Sun, Yapeng
    Guo, Lei
    Zhang, Fei
    Ding, Wenyuan
    Zhang, Wei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [45] Comparative efficacy and fusion outcomes of unilateral bi-portal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treating single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a two-year retrospective study
    Bahir, Abdul Waheed
    Wang, Daxing
    Xiao, Jiayu
    Liu, Bailian
    Gu, Shao
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [46] A novel minimally invasive technique of inter-spinal distraction fusion surgery for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians: a retrospective cohort study
    Chen, Mengmeng
    Jia, Pu
    Feng, Fei
    Tang, Hai
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [47] A novel minimally invasive technique of inter-spinal distraction fusion surgery for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians: a retrospective cohort study
    Mengmeng Chen
    Pu Jia
    Fei Feng
    Hai Tang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [48] Which surgery is better for obese patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: open TLIF or Endo-LIF? A retrospective matched case-control study
    Shen, Xu
    Zhang, Pei
    Gao, Yu-cheng
    Xuan, Wen-bin
    Wang, Feng
    Song, Peng
    Wang, Shu-jiang
    Gao, Zeng-xin
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2023, 69 (05)
  • [49] Comparison of clinical efficacy and surgeon's neck flexion time between unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion in the treatment of single-level lumbar degenerative diseases: a single center retrospective study
    Wei, Wen-Bo
    Dang, Sha-Jie
    Duan, Da-Peng
    Zhao, Wei
    Wei, Ling
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [50] Topical use of tranexamic acid can effectively decrease hidden blood loss during posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery: A retrospective study
    Ren, Zhinan
    Li, Shugang
    Sheng, Lin
    Zhuang, Qianyu
    Li, Zheng
    Xu, Derong
    Chen, Xin
    Jiang, Pengxiang
    Zhang, Xiao
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (42)