Humeral torsional side differences after nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures and humeral shaft fractures: clinical and ultrasonographic assessment

被引:2
|
作者
Razaeian, Sam [1 ]
Menzel, Jan-Niklas [2 ]
Zhang, Dafang [3 ]
Krettek, Christian [4 ]
Hawi, Nael [5 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Trauma Surg, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Traumastiftung gGmbH, Hannover Humerus Registry HHR, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[5] Orthopaed & Surg Clin Braunschweig OCP, Mauernstr 35, D-38100 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
Ultrasonographic humeral torsion; Humeral head retroversion; Proximal humerus fracture; Nonoperative treatment; Humeral shaft fracture; HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; GUIDELINES; CONSTANT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-023-03671-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe purposes of this study were to investigate (1) sonographic humeral torsion (SHT) and side differences ( increment SHT), and (2) to determine the relationship between SHT and range of rotational motion (RORM) as well as functional outcome scores of nonoperatively treated proximal humerus fractures (PHF) and humeral shaft fractures (HSF).MethodsBetween October 2020 and July 2021, consecutive patients with radiographically healed nonoperatively treated PHF and HSF were included in this analysis. Subjective perception of torsional side difference, correlation between SHT and RORM, Subjective Shoulder Value as well as absolute and adjusted Constant Score were determined. Degree of humeral torsional side differences were classified as follows: 0 degrees-15 degrees: minor; > 15 degrees-30 degrees: moderate; > 30 degrees: major. Factors including gender, hand dominance, fracture type, and displacement were also assessed in order to investigate any association between these variables and increment SHT.ResultsSixty-five patients with nonoperatively treated PHF (n = 47) and HSF (n = 18) were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 13.2 months (range, 2.1-72.6). The majority (80% (52)) resulted in only minor, 15.4% (10) in moderate, and 4.6% (3) in major torsional side differences. Patients with minor or moderate torsional differences did not perceive any subjective side difference. While RORM correlated fairly to highly with functional outcomes, only very low to low correlation was observed between these measures and SHT and increment SHT. Gender, fracture displacement, and type of fracture were not related to SHT and increment SHT. However, significantly greater torsional side differences were observed, when the dominant side was involved (p = 0.026).ConclusionNonoperative early functional treatment of proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures results mainly in only minor humeral torsional side differences. Minor and moderate amounts of torsional side differences might not be perceived by patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of pathological humeral shaft fractures with unreamed humeral nail
    Atesok, Kivanc
    Liebergall, Meir
    Sucher, Erwin
    Temper, Mark
    Mosheiff, Rami
    Peyser, Amos
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) : 1493 - 1498
  • [22] Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Fractures of the Humeral Diaphysis The Humeral Shaft Fracture Fixation Randomized Clinical Trial
    Oliver, William M.
    Bell, Katrina R.
    Carter, Thomas H.
    Graham, Catriona
    White, Timothy O.
    Clement, Nicholas D.
    Duckworth, Andrew D.
    Molyneux, Samuel G.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2025,
  • [23] OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES
    BJORKENHEIM, JM
    PAAVOLAINEN, P
    SLATIS, P
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 54 (03): : 504 - 504
  • [24] Rehabilitation After Proximal Humeral Fractures
    Singleton, Erin
    Turner, Robert
    Gulotta, Lawrence
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 15 (01): : 46 - 50
  • [25] Five years' clinical experience with the unreamed humeral nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures
    Fernandez, FF
    Matschke, S
    Hülsenbeck, A
    Egenolf, M
    Wentzensen, A
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2004, 35 (03): : 264 - 271
  • [26] Innovations in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
    Katthagen, J. C.
    Hazra, R. -O. Dey
    Raschke, M. J.
    Heilmann, L.
    Michel, P.
    Lill, H.
    Schliemann, B.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2019, 32 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [27] Conservative treatment of proximal humeral fractures
    Holschen, Malte
    Clasing, Jens
    Bartscht, Tobias
    Ameziane, Yacine
    Moellenhoff, Gunnar
    Steinbeck, Joern
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2022, 17 (03): : 172 - 179
  • [28] Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures
    Ekholm, Radford
    Tidermark, Jan
    Tornkvist, Hans
    Adami, Johanna
    Ponzer, Sari
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2006, 20 (09) : 591 - 596
  • [29] CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE HUMERAL SHAFT
    NASTKOLB, D
    SCHWEIBERER, L
    ORTHOPADE, 1989, 18 (03): : 208 - 213
  • [30] Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
    Charalambous, C. P.
    Siddique, I.
    Valluripalli, K.
    Kovacevic, M.
    Panose, P.
    Srinivasan, M.
    Marynissen, H.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2007, 127 (03) : 205 - 210