共 50 条
Quantitative Synthesis of Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Vaccine Hesitancy in 185 Countries
被引:5
|作者:
Dinga, Jerome Nyhalah
[1
,2
]
Kabakama, Severin
[3
]
Njimoh, Dieudonne Lemuh
[4
]
Chia, Julius Ebua
[5
]
Morhason-Bello, Imran
[6
]
Lumu, Ivan
[7
]
机构:
[1] Michael Gahnyam Gbeugvat Fdn, POB 63, Buea, Cameroon
[2] Univ Buea, Biotechnol Unit, POB 63, Buea, Cameroon
[3] Humanitarian & Publ Hlth Consultant, POB 511, Mwanza, Tanzania
[4] Univ Buea, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, POB 63, Buea, Cameroon
[5] WHO, Reg Off Afr, POB 06, Brazzaville, Rep Congo
[6] Univ Ibadan, Coll Med, Ibadan 200284, Nigeria
[7] Makerere Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Infect Dis Inst, POB 7072, Kampala, Uganda
来源:
关键词:
COVID-19;
health belief model;
vaccine acceptance;
vaccine hesitancy;
gross domestic product;
quantitative synthesis;
world bank income level;
meta-analysis;
HEALTH-CARE WORKERS;
SARS-COV-2;
TURKEY;
WOMEN;
D O I:
10.3390/vaccines12010034
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Mass vaccination against COVID-19 is the best method to ensure herd immunity in order to curb the effect of the pandemic on the global economy. It is therefore important to assess the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy on a global scale. Factors were recorded from cross-sectional studies analyzed with t-Test, ANOVA, correlation, and meta-regression analyses and synthesized to identify global trends in order to inform policy. We registered the protocol (ID: CRD42022350418) and used standard Cochrane methods and PRISMA guidelines to collect and synthesize cross-sectional articles published between January 2020 and August 2023. A total of 67 articles with 576 studies from 185 countries involving 3081,766 participants were included in this synthesis. Global COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was 65.27% (95% CI; 62.72-67.84%), while global vaccine hesitancy stood at 32.1% (95% CI; 29.05-35.17%). One-Way ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference in the percentage Gross Domestic Product spent on vaccine procurement across the World Bank income levels (p < 0.187). There was a significant difference of vaccine acceptance (p < 0.001) and vaccine hesitancy (p < 0.005) across the different World Bank Income levels. World Bank income level had a strong influence on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (p < 0.0004) and hesitancy (p < 0.003) but percentage Gross Domestic Product spent on vaccine procurement did not. There was no correlation between percentage Gross Domestic Product spent on vaccine procurement and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (r = -0.11, p < 0.164) or vaccine hesitancy (r = -0.09, p < 0.234). Meta-regression analysis showed that living in an urban setting (OR = 4.83, 95% CI; 0.67-212.8), rural setting (OR = 2.53, 95% CI; 0.29-119.33), older (OR = 1.98, 95% CI; 0.99-4.07), higher education (OR = 1.76, 95% CI; 0.85-3.81), and being a low income earner (OR = 2.85, 95% CI; 0.45-30.63) increased the odds of high COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Factors that increased the odds of high COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were no influenza vaccine (OR = 33.06, 95% CI; 5.03-1395.01), mistrust for vaccines (OR = 3.91, 95% CI; 1.92-8.24), complacency (OR = 2.86, 95% CI; 1.02-8.83), pregnancy (OR = 2.3, 95% CI; 0.12-141.76), taking traditional herbs (OR = 2.15, 95% CI; 0.52-10.42), being female (OR = 1.53, 95% CI; 0.78-3.01), and safety concerns (OR = 1.29, 95% CI; 0.67-2.51). We proposed a number of recommendations to increase vaccine acceptance and ensure global herd immunity against COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文