Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guideline Update

被引:186
|
作者
Wolff, Antonio C. [1 ]
Somerfield, Mark R. [2 ]
Dowsett, Mitchell [3 ]
Hammond, M. Elizabeth H. [4 ,5 ]
Hayes, Daniel F. [6 ]
McShane, Lisa M. [7 ]
Saphner, Thomas J. [8 ]
Spears, Patricia A. [9 ]
Allison, Kimberly H. [10 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Alexandria, VA USA
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Intermt Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[8] Vince Lombardi Canc Clin, Two Rivers, WI USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[10] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
HER2; EXPRESSION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.22.02864
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE To update ASCO-College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer. The Panel is aware that a new generation of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the HER2 protein is active against breast cancers that lack protein overexpression or gene amplification. METHODS An Update Panel conducted a systematic literature review to identify signals for updating recommendations. RESULTS The search identified 173 abstracts. Of five potential publications reviewed, none constituted a signal for revising existing recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS The 2018 ASCO-CAP recommendations for HER2 testing are affirmed. DISCUSSION HER2 testing guidelines have focused on identifying HER2 protein over-expression or gene amplification in breast cancer to identify patients for therapies that disrupt HER2 signaling. This update acknowledges a new indication for trastuzumab deruxtecan when HER2 is not overexpressed or amplified but is immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ without amplification by in situ hybridization. Clinical trial data on tumors that tested IHC 0 are limited (excluded from DESTINY-Breast04), and evidence is lacking that these cancers behave differently or do not respond similarly to newer HER2 ADCs. Although current data do not support a new IHC 0 versus 1+ prognostic or predictive threshold for response to trastuzumab deruxtecan, this threshold is now relevant because of the trial entry criteria that supported its new regulatory approval. Therefore, while it is premature to create new result categories of HER2 expression (eg, HER2-Low, HER2-Ultra-Low), best practices to distinguish IHC 0 from 1+ are now clinically relevant. This Update affirms prior HER2 reporting recommendations and offers a new HER2 testing reporting comment to highlight the current relevance of IHC 0 versus 1+ results and best practice recommendations to distinguish these often subtle differences. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:3867 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recommendations on Disease Management for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary
    Ramakrishna, Naren
    Temin, Sarah
    Lin, Nancy U.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (08) : 505 - +
  • [42] HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update Summary
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth Hale
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Harvey, Brittany E.
    McShane, Lisa M.
    Dowsett, Mitchell
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (07) : 437 - +
  • [43] Comparative Performance of Breast Cancer Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Brightfield In Situ Hybridization on College of American Pathologists Proficiency Tests
    Geiersbach, Katherine B.
    Bridge, Julia A.
    Dolan, Michelle
    Jennings, Lawrence J.
    Persons, Diane L.
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Tsuchiya, Karen D.
    Vasalos, Patricia H.
    Moncur, Joel T.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 142 (10) : 1254 - 1259
  • [44] The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups
    Woo, Ji Won
    Lee, Kyoungyul
    Chung, Yul Ri
    Jang, Min Hye
    Ahn, Soomin
    Park, So Yeon
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 98 : 10 - 21
  • [45] Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That is Either Endocrine-Pretreated or Hormone Receptor-Negative: ASCO Guideline Update
    Moy, Beverly
    Rumble, R. Bryan
    Come, Steven E.
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    Di Leo, Angelo
    Gralow, Julie R.
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Yee, Douglas
    Smith, Ian E.
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    Nanda, Rita
    McArthur, Heather L.
    Spring, Laura
    Reeder-Hayes, Katherine E.
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Unger, Paul S.
    Vinayak, Shaveta
    Irvin, William J., Jr.
    Armaghani, Avan
    Danso, Michael A.
    Dickson, Natalie
    Turner, Sophie S.
    Perkins, Cheryl L.
    Carey, Lisa A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (35) : 3938 - +
  • [46] National Guidelines and Level of Evidence: Comments on Some of the New Recommendations in the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Guidelines for Breast Cancer
    Rakha, Emad A.
    Pigera, Marian
    Shaaban, Abeer
    Shin, Sandra J.
    D'Alfonso, Timothy
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Lee, Andrew H. S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (11)
  • [47] Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 testing in breast cancer
    Shah, Sejal S.
    Ketterling, Rhett P.
    Perez, Edith A.
    Chen, Beiyun
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2008, 452 : S23 - S24
  • [48] National Guidelines and Level of Evidence: Comments on Some of the New Recommendations in the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Guidelines for Breast Cancer Reply
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth H.
    Hicks, David G.
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Bartlett, John M. S.
    Bilous, Michael
    Fitzgibbons, Patrick
    Hanna, Wedad
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    Mangu, Pamela B.
    Paik, Soonmyung
    Perez, Edith A.
    Press, Michael F.
    Spears, Patricia A.
    Vance, Gail H.
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Dowsett, Mitch
    McShane, Lisa M.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (11) : 1302 - 1304
  • [49] Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That Is Either Endocrine-Pretreated or Hormone Receptor-Negative: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update
    Moy, Beverly
    Rumble, Bryan
    Carey, Lisa A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (26) : 3088 - +
  • [50] Clinical Potential of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 3 Imaging in Breast Cancer
    Henry, Kelly E.
    Ulaner, Gary A.
    Lewis, Jason S.
    PET CLINICS, 2018, 13 (03) : 423 - +