Childhood BMI after ART with frozen embryo transfer

被引:4
|
作者
Asserhoj, Louise Laub [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Mizrak, Ikram [1 ,4 ]
Heldarskard, Gerda Ferja [1 ]
Clausen, Tine Dalsgaard [5 ,6 ]
Hoffmann, Eva R. [7 ]
Greisen, Gorm [6 ,8 ]
Main, Katharina M. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Madsen, Per Lav [4 ,6 ]
Jensen, Rikke Beck [2 ,3 ,6 ,9 ]
Pinborg, Anja [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Rigshosp, Fertil Clin, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Rigshosp, Dept Growth & Reprod, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Rigshosp, Int Ctr Res & Training Disrupt Male Reprod & Child, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Herlev Gentofte Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Herlev, Denmark
[5] Nordsjaellands Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hillerod, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Danish Natl Res Fdn DNRF, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Cellular & Mol Med,Ctr Chromosome Stabil, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Rigshosp, Dept Neonatol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev, Dept Pediat, Herlev, Denmark
[10] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Rigshosp, Fertil Clin, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
ART; frozen embryo transfer; BMI; anthropometrics; childhood growth; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; HIGH BIRTH-WEIGHT; FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE; SINGLETONS BORN; TRANSFER FET; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; METABOLIC SYNDROME; POSTNATAL-GROWTH; PUBERTAL CHANGES; CHILDREN BORN;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dead127
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION Does BMI at 7-10 years of age differ in children conceived after frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to children conceived after fresh embryo transfer (fresh-ET) or natural conception (NC)? SUMMARY ANSWER BMI in childhood does not differ between children conceived after FET compared to children conceived after fresh-ET or NC. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY High childhood BMI is strongly associated with obesity and cardiometabolic disease and mortality in adulthood. Children conceived after FET have a higher risk of being born large for gestational age (LGA) than children conceived after NC. It is well-documented that being born LGA is associated with an increased risk of obesity in childhood, and it has been hypothesized that ART induces epigenetic variations around fertilization, implantation, and early embryonic stages, which influence fetal size at birth as well as BMI and health later in life. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study 'Health in Childhood following Assisted Reproductive Technology' (HiCART) is a large retrospective cohort study with 606 singletons aged 7-10 years divided into three groups according to mode of conception: FET (n = 200), fresh-ET (n = 203), and NC (n = 203). All children were born in Eastern Denmark from 2009 to 2013 and the study was conducted from January 2019 to September 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We anticipated that the participation rate would differ between the three study groups owing to variation in the motivation to engage. To reach the goal of 200 children in each group, we invited 478 in the FET-group, 661 in the fresh-ET-group, and 1175 in the NC-group. The children underwent clinical examinations including anthropometric measurements, whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-scan, and pubertal staging. Standard deviation scores (SDS) were calculated for all anthropometric measurements using Danish reference values. Parents completed a questionnaire regarding the pregnancy and the current health of the child and themselves. Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal data were obtained from the Danish IVF Registry and Danish Medical Birth Registry. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE As expected, children conceived after FET had a significantly higher birthweight (SDS) compared to both children born after fresh-ET (mean difference 0.42, 95% CI (0.21; 0.62)) and NC (mean difference 0.35, 95% CI (0.14; 0.57)). At follow-up (7-10 years), no differences were found in BMI (SDS) comparing FET to fresh-ET, FET to NC, and fresh-ET to NC. Similar results were also found regarding the secondary outcomes weight (SDS), height (SDS), sitting height, waist circumference, hip circumference, fat, and fat percentage. In the multivariate linear regression analyses, the effect of mode of conception remained non-significant after adjusting for multiple confounders. When stratified on sex, weight (SDS), and height (SDS) were significantly higher for girls born after FET compared to girls born after NC. Further, FET-girls also had significantly higher waist, hip, and fat measurements compared to girls born after fresh-ET. However, for the boys the differences remained insignificant after confounder adjustment. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The sample size was decided in order to detect a difference of 0.3 SDS in childhood BMI (which corresponds to an adult cardiovascular mortality hazard ratio of 1.034). Thus, smaller differences in BMI SDS may be overlooked. As the overall participation rate was 26% (FET: 41%, fresh-ET: 31%, NC: 18%), selection bias cannot be excluded. Regarding the three study groups, many possible confounders have been included but there might be a small risk of selection bias as information regarding cause of infertility is not available in this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The increased birthweight in children conceived after FET did not translate into differences in BMI, however, for the girls born after FET, we observed increased height (SDS) and weight (SDS) compared to the girls born after NC, while for the boys the results remained insignificant after confounder adjustment. Since body composition in childhood is a strong biomarker of cardiometabolic disease later in life, longitudinal studies of girls and boys born after FET are needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number: NNF18OC0034092, NFF19OC0054340) and Rigshospitalets Research Foundation. There were no competing interests.
引用
收藏
页码:1578 / 1589
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ART outcome after euploid frozen embryo transfer is not affected by previous Cesarean section delivery in the absence of intracavitary fluid
    Bayram, Asina
    Elkhatib, Ibrahim
    Abdala, Andrea
    Nogueira, Daniela
    Melado, Laura
    Fatemi, Human M.
    Lawrenz, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (11) : 2529 - 2537
  • [32] ART outcome after euploid frozen embryo transfer is not affected by previous Cesarean section delivery in the absence of intracavitary fluid
    Asina Bayram
    Ibrahim Elkhatib
    Andrea Abdala
    Daniela Nogueira
    Laura Melado
    Human M. Fatemi
    Barbara Lawrenz
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 2529 - 2537
  • [33] Single frozen embryo transfer as compared to multiple embryo transfer.
    Anderson, A. R.
    Graff, K. J.
    Distefano, J.
    Crain, J. L.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 : S207 - S207
  • [34] The role of timing in frozen embryo transfer
    Lensen, Sarah
    Lantsberg, Daniel
    Gardner, David K.
    Sophian, Azzahra Daniveruszhka
    Wandafiana, Namira
    Kamath, Mohan S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (05) : 832 - 838
  • [35] Ideal frozen embryo transfer regime
    Castillo, Juan
    Kol, Shahar
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 36 (03) : 148 - 154
  • [36] Frozen Embryo Transfer and Preeclampsia Risk
    Severino, Ana Isabel
    Povoa, Ana Margarida
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 50 (09)
  • [37] Elective frozen embryo transfer for all?
    Coutifaris, Christos
    LANCET, 2019, 393 (10178): : 1264 - 1265
  • [38] Endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer
    Strowitzki, Thomas
    GYNAKOLOGIE, 2025,
  • [39] PATIENT BMI AND OPTIMIZING THE METHOD OF ENDOMETRIAL PREPARATION IN FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFERS: AN ANALYSIS OF FROZEN SINGLE EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFERS
    Kort, J. D.
    Shah, M.
    Milki, A. A.
    Lathi, R. B.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (02) : E27 - E27
  • [40] Cardiovascular function in 8-to 9-year-old singletons born after ART with frozen and fresh embryo transfer
    Mizrak, I
    Asserhoj, L. L.
    Lund, M. A., V
    Kielstrup, L. R.
    Greisen, G.
    Clausen, T. D.
    Main, K. M.
    Jensen, R. B.
    Vejlstrup, N. G.
    Madsen, P. L.
    Pinborg, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (03) : 600 - 611