The experience of shared decision-making for patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis and their families-A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Mcpeake, Mari-Louise [1 ,4 ]
Cook, Neal [1 ]
Mcilfatrick, Sonja [2 ]
Hasson, Felicity [3 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Paramed Sci, Londonderry, North Ireland
[2] Ulster Univ, Doctoral Coll, Belfast, North Ireland
[3] Ulster Univ, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Paramed Sci, Belfast, North Ireland
[4] Ulster Univ, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Paramed Sci, Magee Campus, Londonderry BT48 7JL, North Ireland
关键词
end-stage kidney disease; family; caregivers; haemodialysis people; shared decision-making; DIALYSIS; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; TRANSPLANTATION; CHOICE; HEALTH; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.16766
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo identify the experiences of shared decision-making (SDM) for adults with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis (HD) and their family members. DesignA scoping literature review. MethodA scoping literature review, using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Data sourcesMedline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL, Psych Info, ProQuest, Web of Science, Open grey and grey literature were searched covering years from January 2015 to July 2022. Empirical studies, unpublished thesis and studies in English were included. The scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta analysis-scoping review extension (PRISMA-Scr). ResultsThirteen studies were included in the final review. While SDM is welcomed by people undergoing HD, their experience is often limited to treatment decisions, with little opportunity to revisit decisions previously made. The role of the family/caregivers as active participants in SDM requires recognition. ConclusionPeople with end-stage kidney disease undergoing HD do and want to participate in the process of SDM, on a wide range of topics, in addition to treatment. A strategy is needed to ensure that SDM interventions are successful in achieving patient-driven outcomes and enhancing their quality of life. Implications for clinical practiceThis review highlights the experiences of people undergoing HD and their family/caregivers. There is a wide variety of clinical decisions requiring consideration for people undergoing HD, including considering the importance who should be involved in the decision-making processes and when decisions should occur. Further study to ensure nurses understand the importance, and influence of including family members in conversations on both SDM processes and outcomes is needed. There is a need for research from both patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives to ensure that people feel supported and have their needs met in the SDM process. Patient and Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:6243 / 6253
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SHARED DECISION-MAKING IN GENETIC COUNSELING: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Peng, Chenyang
    Ni, Ning
    Li, Yiyu
    Tan, Xiangmin
    Tu, Chaofeng
    Mei, Sun
    ACTA BIOETHICA, 2022, 28 (02) : 227 - 237
  • [32] Shared Decision-Making in Patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review
    Kooijman, Maria-Annette
    van Leeuwen, Goudje L.
    Schuurmann, Richte C. L.
    van Leeuwen, Barbara L.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    van der Wal-huisman, Hanneke
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 112 : 193 - 221
  • [33] The cardiovascular determinants of physical function in patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
    Sherna F. Adenwalla
    Roseanne E. Billany
    Daniel S. March
    Gaurav S. Gulsin
    Hannah M. L. Young
    Patrick Highton
    Darren C. Churchward
    Robin Young
    Alysha Careless
    Clare L. Tomlinson
    Gerry P. McCann
    James O. Burton
    Matthew P. M. Graham-Brown
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021, 37 : 1405 - 1414
  • [34] Quality of life in patients with end-stage kidney disease in relation to haemodialysis treatment
    Ilic, S
    Djordjevic, V
    Apostolovic, S
    Stefanovic, V
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (7-8) : 169 - 169
  • [35] The cardiovascular determinants of physical function in patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
    Adenwalla, Sherna F.
    Billany, Roseanne E.
    March, Daniel S.
    Gulsin, Gaurav S.
    Young, Hannah M. L.
    Highton, Patrick
    Churchward, Darren C.
    Young, Robin
    Careless, Alysha
    Tomlinson, Clare L.
    McCann, Gerry P.
    Burton, James O.
    Graham-Brown, Matthew P. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 37 (04): : 1405 - 1414
  • [36] A Scoping Review of Decision Support Tools for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Toward Shared Decision-Making
    Yu, Annie X.
    Ding, Joel B.
    Davies, Alun H.
    Shan, Leonard L.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 106 : 25 - 36
  • [37] KIDNEY FAILURE TREATMENT OPTIONS AND SHARED DECISION-MAKING BY ETHNIC CHINESE: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Li, Alice
    Richardson, Michelle
    Covaleski, Audrey
    Heinrich, Christina
    Meyer, Klemens
    Vesel, Tamara
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2023, 81 (04) : S72 - S72
  • [38] Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Li, Xuejing
    Meng, Meiqi
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Dan
    Fang, Jiaxin
    Wang, Junxin
    Han, Liu
    Hao, Yufang
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2021, 15 : 2763 - 2781
  • [39] END-STAGE KIDNEY DISEASE - SUPPORTING THE TREATMENT OPTION DECISION MAKING PROCESS
    Fortnum, D.
    Smolonogov, T.
    Kairaitis, L.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 18 : 40 - 40
  • [40] Making sense of glucose sensors in end-stage kidney disease: A review
    Williams, Mark E.
    Steenkamp, Devin
    Wolpert, Howard
    FRONTIERS IN CLINICAL DIABETES AND HEALTHCARE, 2022, 3