On optimal lead rubber base-isolation design for steel moment frames using value-based seismic design approach

被引:17
|
作者
Rahgozar, Arash [1 ]
Estekanchi, Homayoon E. [1 ]
Mirfarhadi, S. Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Azadi Ave, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Guilan, Dept Civil Engn, Guilan, Iran
关键词
Seismic design; Optimization; Life -cycle cost; Endurance time method; Classical seismic risk analysis; Base; -isolation; Steel moment frame; CYCLE COST OPTIMIZATION; ENDURANCE TIME METHOD; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; KNOWLEDGE; RETROFIT; DEVICES; MODELS; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107520
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper employs the framework of value-based seismic design to optimize the geometrical and mechanical properties of lead rubber bearings (LRBs). An optimization problem is proposed within this framework. Con-struction cost and seismic consequences are chosen as the value components. Most failure modes of the LRB, such as strength deterioration, axial buckling, and rubber rupture, have been carefully considered in the seismic response. Besides, a new cost function for LRBs is developed from actual isolated building projects. Moreover, the minimum code requirements for lead rubber isolated buildings are formulated as the design constraints. FEMA P-58 methodology is exploited to predict the seismic consequences, including the repair cost, repair time, injury, and fatality. Endurance time method is used to evaluate the structural seismic responses. A set of three lead rubber isolated buildings are selected for investigation, representing low-to mid-rise moment-resisting frames (MRFs). Each building is optimally designed by two scenarios: the code-based design (CBD) by minimizing the initial construction cost and the value-based design (VBD) by maximizing the total building value. It is observed that the total building values of the isolated MRFs optimized with the CBD approach are somewhat acceptable. However, they can be significantly increased with the VBD approach because it adequately reduces the proba-bility of axial buckling and rupture of LRBs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On optimal triple friction pendulum base-isolation design for steel moment-frame buildings employing value-based seismic design methodology
    Rahgozar, Arash
    Estekanchi, Homayoon E.
    Mirfarhadi, S. Ali
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 63
  • [2] Seismic design optimization considering base-isolation system
    Ivanov, A. Y.
    Chernogorskiy, S. A.
    Vlasov, M. P.
    MAGAZINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 80 (04): : 138 - 150
  • [3] Seismic damage-based design of steel moment frames
    Morsali, Vafa
    Behnamfar, Farhad
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 25 (09) : 1591 - 1608
  • [4] Optimal design of isolation devices for mid-rise steel moment frames using performance based methodology
    Zhang, Jian
    Shu, Zhan
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (09) : 4315 - 4338
  • [5] Optimal design of isolation devices for mid-rise steel moment frames using performance based methodology
    Jian Zhang
    Zhan Shu
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16 : 4315 - 4338
  • [6] Connection performance for seismic design of steel moment frames
    Roeder, CW
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2002, 128 (04): : 517 - 525
  • [7] Improved seismic design method for steel moment frames
    Darabi A.
    Akbari J.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 21 (4) : 723 - 731
  • [8] Improved seismic design procedure for steel moment frames
    Villani, A.
    Castro, J. M.
    Elghazouli, A. Y.
    STESSA 2009 - BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2009, : 673 - 678
  • [9] Optimal seismic design of moment-resisting steel frames with hysteretic passive devices
    Apostolakis, G.
    Dargush, G. F.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2010, 39 (04): : 355 - 376
  • [10] Seismic Performance and Design of Steel Panel Dampers for Steel Moment Frames
    Liu, Judy
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 55 (04): : 245 - 252