Gender and agricultural Productivity: Econometric evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda

被引:5
|
作者
Julien, Jacques C. [1 ]
Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. [2 ]
Rada, Nicholas E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pacifico, Jiron Luis Sanchez Cerro 2141 Lima, Lima 15072, Peru
[2] Univ Talca, Univ Connecticut, WB Young Bldg 1376 Storrs Rd Storrs, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] US Patent & Trademark Off, 600 Dulany St, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
关键词
Gender gap; sub-Saharan Africa; Stochastic production frontier; Total factor productivity; Technical efficiency; Stochastic meta-frontier; Correlated true random effects; METAFRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER MODELS; FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; PROPENSITY SCORE; UNOBSERVED HETEROGENEITY; SHADOW WAGES; TECHNOLOGY; LAND; LABOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106365
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Agricultural productivity gaps between men and women have been widely documented in many sub-Saharan African countries. Fundamentally, though, we contend that women have the same inherent intellectual (and thus farm management) capabilities as men but are inhibited by local conditions that put them at a disadvantage. We, therefore, hypothesize that by controlling for observed socio-economic, geographic, and agro-ecological characteristics, gender related farm productivity gaps would fade. Drawing on the Living Standards Measurement Study-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture for Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda, we first match on observables to select comparable plots managed by male and female farmers, then estimate correlated true random effects stochastic production frontiers, followed by a meta-frontier to examine total factor productivity (TFP) and benchmarked technical efficiency. At the core of our approach is controlling for systematic observed and unobserved heterogeneity that could bias the comparative analysis. Results are mixed, but they tend to support our hypothesis. In Malawi, where we find market imperfections favor female farmers, women are more efficient than are male farmers and they exhibit TFP performance parity. In contrast, Tanzanian and Ugandan labor market imperfections favor male farmers, as do efficiency and TFP performance estimates.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gender gaps in sorghum productivity: evidence from male- and female-managed plots in Uganda
    Miriti, Philip
    Otieno, David Jakinda
    Chimoita, Evans
    Bikketi, Edward
    Njuguna, Esther
    Ojiewo, Chris O.
    DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2023, 33 (04) : 375 - 386
  • [32] Gender, Weather Shocks and Welfare: Evidence from Malawi
    Asfaw, Solomon
    Maggio, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2018, 54 (02): : 271 - 291
  • [33] Evaluation of facial cleanliness and environmental improvement activities: Lessons learned from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda
    Sanders, Angelia M.
    Dixon, Ruth
    Stuck, Logan
    Kelly, Michaela
    Woods, Geordie
    Muheki, Edridah M.
    Baayenda, Gilbert
    Masika, Michael
    Kafanikhale, Holystone
    Mwingira, Upendo
    Wohlgemuth, Leah
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2021, 15 (11):
  • [34] Health and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Zambia
    Fink, Guenther
    Masiye, Felix
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 42 : 151 - 164
  • [36] The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Productivity in Tanzania
    Mafie, Gabriel K.
    INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2022, 36 (01) : 129 - 145
  • [37] MANAGING EQUITY AND GENDER IN AN AGRICULTURAL PROGRAM IN MALAWI
    HIRSCHMANN, D
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 15 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [38] The Political Effects of Agricultural Subsidies in Africa: Evidence from Malawi
    Dionne, Kim Yi
    Horowitz, Jeremy
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 87 : 215 - 226
  • [39] Gender Discrimination in Microfinance? Some Evidence from Uganda
    Corsi, Marcella
    De Angelis, Marina
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2017, 53 (05): : 723 - 740
  • [40] R & D and productivity: The econometric evidence.
    Abel, R
    PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1999, 15 (02) : 63 - 65