A New Risk Score to Predict Intensive Care Unit Admission for Patients with Acute Pancreatitis 48 Hours After Admission: Multicenter Study

被引:4
|
作者
Yuan, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Shen, Lei [4 ,6 ]
Ji, Mengyao [4 ,6 ]
Wen, Xinyu [4 ]
Wang, Shuo [4 ]
Huang, Pingxiao [5 ]
Li, Yong [7 ]
Xu, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Automat, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Dept Informat Ctr, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Inst AI Med, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Gastroenterol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Key Lab Hubei Prov Digest Syst Dis, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[7] Suining Cent Hosp, Suining, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Acute pancreatitis; Risk score; Intensive care unit; Precision medicine; Stratification; PERSISTENT ORGAN FAILURE; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; MORTALITY; DEFINITIONS; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-022-07768-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: The objective of this study was to develop and validate an easy-to-use risk score (APRS) to predict which patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) will need intensive care unit (ICU) treatment within 48 h post-hospitalization on the basis of the ubiquitously available clinical records. Methods: Patients with acute pancreatitis were retrospectively included from three independent institutions (RM cohort, 5280; TJ cohort, 262; SN cohort, 196), with 56 candidate variables collected within 48 h post-hospitalization. The RM cohort was randomly divided into a training set (N = 4220) and a test set (N = 1060). The most predictive features were extracted by LASSO from the RM cohort and entered into multivariate analysis. APRS was constructed using the coefficients of the statistically significant variables weighted by the multivariable logistic regression model. The APRS was validated by RM, TJ, and SN cohorts. The C-statistic was employed to evaluate the APRS's discrimination. DeLong test was used to compare area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) differences. Results: A total of 5738 patients with AP were enrolled. Eleven variables were selected by LASSO and entered into multivariate analysis. APRS was inferred using the above five factors (pleural effusion, ALT/AST, ALB/GLB, urea, and glucose) weighted by their regression coefficients in the multivariable logistic regression model. The C-statistics of APRS were 0.905 (95% CI 0.82-0.98) and 0.889 (95% CI 0.81-0.96) in RM and TJ validation. An online APRS web-based calculator was constructed to assist the clinician to earlier assess the clinical outcomes of patients with AP. Conclusion: APRS could effectively stratify patients with AP into high and low risk of ICU admission within 48 h post-hospitalization, offering clinical value in directing management and personalize therapeutic selection for patients with AP.
引用
收藏
页码:2069 / 2079
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Admission to intensive care unit after major surgery
    Zampieri, Fernando G.
    Lone, Nazir I.
    Bagshaw, Sean M.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 49 (05) : 575 - 578
  • [42] Risk Factors and Outcomes of Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Transfers Within 24 Hours of Admission
    Kamper, M.
    Hukku, A.
    Hidalgo, D. Colon
    Si, G.
    Simpson, K. P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [43] Pain and psychopathology after intensive care unit admission
    Smaisim, Nour
    Rijsdijk, Mienke
    van der Does, Yuri
    Slooter, Arjen J. C.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 52 (04) : 232 - 240
  • [44] A risk model to predict an unplanned admission to the intensive care unit following lung resection
    Brunelli, Alessandro
    Begum, Housne
    Chaudhuri, Nilanjan
    Agzarian, John
    Milton, Richard
    Finley, Christian
    Tcherveniakov, Peter
    Valuckiene, Laura
    Gioutsos, Konstantinos
    Hanna, Wael
    Papagiannopoulos, Kostas
    Shargall, Yaron
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 61 (06) : 1232 - 1239
  • [45] Admission to intensive care unit after major surgery
    Fernando G. Zampieri
    Nazir I. Lone
    Sean M. Bagshaw
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2023, 49 : 575 - 578
  • [46] Mental illness after admission to an intensive care unit
    Sivanathan, Lavarnan
    Wunsch, Hannah
    Vigod, Simone
    Hill, Andrea
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Scales, Damon C.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 45 (11) : 1550 - 1558
  • [47] Med-Score 24: A multivariable prediction model for poststernotomy mediastinitis 24 hours after admission to the intensive care unit
    Nieto-Cabrera, Mercedes
    Fernandez-Perez, Cristina
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Ines
    Carlos Martin-Benitez, Juan
    Ferrero, Justo
    Bringas, Maria
    Carnero, Manuel
    Maroto, Luis
    Sanchez-Garcia, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (03): : 1041 - +
  • [48] Post-tPA Care for Acute Stroke Patients; Comparison between Intensive Care Unit Admission and Stroke Unit Admission.
    Chalela, Julio
    Steffen, Cynthia
    Gay, Sarah
    Ramos, Leah
    Hays, Angela
    STROKE, 2013, 44 (02)
  • [49] Multicenter validation of a machine learning model to predict intensive care unit readmission within 48 hours after discharge
    Lim, Leerang
    Kim, Mincheol
    Cho, Kyungjae
    Yoo, Dongjoon
    Sim, Dayeon
    Ryu, Ho Geol
    Lee, Hyung-Chul
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2025, 81
  • [50] The predictive value of the modified early warning score for admission to the intensive care unit in patients with a hematologic malignancy-A multicenter observational study
    van Mourik, Niels
    Oomen, Jesse J.
    van Vught, Lonneke A.
    Biemond, Bart J.
    van den Bergh, Walter M.
    Blijlevens, Nicole M. A.
    Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
    Muller, Marcella C. A.
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 79