Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures in burn-specific tools: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Calandra [1 ]
Solish, Max [1 ]
Rogers, Alan D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Ross Tilley Burn Ctr, D718,2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Patient reported outcome measures; Burn care; Thermal injury; Quality improvement; Biopsychosocial model of illness; Rehabilitation; Reintegration; Pediatric burn; HEALTH-STATUS; RISK-FACTORS; CHILDREN; INJURY; IMPACT; VALIDATION; SURVIVORS; RECOVERY; ADULTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2023.10.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now well-established tools to evaluate the quality of patient-centred care. Due to the multi-faceted and multi-disciplinary nature of the practice of burn care, as well as the range of significant potential sequelae, PROM's should form a fundamental component of burn quality improvement programs. We aim to 1. Explore biological, psychological, and social considerations that are currently listed in burn-specific PROM tools, as well as their efficacy, 2. Evaluate biological, psychological, and social factors that are considered in new burn-specific PROM tools or those under development, and 3. Identify any opportunities with respect to burn-specific PROM tools, in order to inform future investigation in this area.Methods: A search was performed of MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases. Two independent reviewers screened article titles/abstracts and then the full texts using Covidence. All studies were graded independently according to the Quality Rating Scheme for Studies and Other Evidences. Results: The initial search yielded 552 references. Based on ab initio inclusion and exclusion criteria, 133 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and 21 articles were ultimately included in the systematic review. Due to study heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Existing burn-specific PROMs covered a range of biological, psychological, and social factors affecting adult and paediatric patients with burn injury, but several studies required additional PROMs for a thorough evaluation. Burn-specific PROM tools under development are poised to fill this deficit. Conclusion: Major burn injuries are a unique form of trauma, requiring coordinated man-agement that considers numerous factors not relevant to other patient populations. Further research is necessary to validate existing burn-specific PROM tools and to develop more comprehensive burn-specific PROM measures that more comprehensively incorporate the bio-psycho-social model of health.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Blood, Zachary
    Anh Tran
    Caleo, Lauren
    Saw, Robyn
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Shackleton, Mark
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Arnold, Chris
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [32] Quality of patient-reported outcome measures for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
    Piontek, Katharina
    Gabes, Michaela
    Kann, Gesina
    Fechtner, Marie
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [33] Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review
    Wee, Priscilla Jia Ling
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Loh, Dionne Hui Fang
    Phang, Jie Kie
    Puar, Troy H.
    Ostbye, Truls
    Thumboo, Julian
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Low, Lian Leng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
  • [34] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Schoch, Dominic
    Sommer, Rachel
    Augustin, Matthias
    Staender, Sonja
    Blome, Christine
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 137 (10) : 2069 - 2077
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures in individuals with amelogenesis imperfecta: a systematic review
    Appelstrand, S. B.
    Robertson, A.
    Sabel, N.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 23 (06) : 885 - 895
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome measures following gynecomastia correction: a systematic review
    Barone M.
    Cogliandro A.
    Morelli Coppola M.
    Cassotta G.
    Di Stefano N.
    Tambone V.
    Persichetti P.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2018, 41 (2) : 109 - 118
  • [37] Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
    Yanpin Fan
    Xin Shu
    Katherine Chiu Man Leung
    Edward Chin Man Lo
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [38] Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedic Surgery A Systematic Review
    Docter, Shgufta
    Fathalla, Zina
    Lukacs, Michael J.
    Khan, Michaela C. M.
    Jennings, Morgan
    Liu, Shu-Hsuan
    Dong, Susan
    Getgood, Alan
    Bryant, Dianne M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (02): : 185 - 190
  • [39] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Fatigue in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
    Ju, Angela
    Unruh, Mark L.
    Davison, Sara N.
    Dapueto, Juan
    Dew, Mary Amanda
    Fluck, Richard
    Germain, Michael
    Jassal, Sarbjit Vanita
    Obrador, Gregorio
    O'Donoghue, Donal
    Tugwell, Peter
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Ralph, Angelique F.
    Howell, Martin
    Tong, Allison
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 71 (03) : 327 - 343
  • [40] Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric surgery-A systematic review
    Besner, Anne-Sophie
    Ferreira, Julia Loyola
    Ow, Nikki
    Gaffar, Rana
    Guadagno, Elena
    Emil, Sherif
    Poenaru, Dan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2022, 57 (05) : 798 - 812