Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures in burn-specific tools: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Calandra [1 ]
Solish, Max [1 ]
Rogers, Alan D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Ross Tilley Burn Ctr, D718,2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Patient reported outcome measures; Burn care; Thermal injury; Quality improvement; Biopsychosocial model of illness; Rehabilitation; Reintegration; Pediatric burn; HEALTH-STATUS; RISK-FACTORS; CHILDREN; INJURY; IMPACT; VALIDATION; SURVIVORS; RECOVERY; ADULTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2023.10.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now well-established tools to evaluate the quality of patient-centred care. Due to the multi-faceted and multi-disciplinary nature of the practice of burn care, as well as the range of significant potential sequelae, PROM's should form a fundamental component of burn quality improvement programs. We aim to 1. Explore biological, psychological, and social considerations that are currently listed in burn-specific PROM tools, as well as their efficacy, 2. Evaluate biological, psychological, and social factors that are considered in new burn-specific PROM tools or those under development, and 3. Identify any opportunities with respect to burn-specific PROM tools, in order to inform future investigation in this area.Methods: A search was performed of MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases. Two independent reviewers screened article titles/abstracts and then the full texts using Covidence. All studies were graded independently according to the Quality Rating Scheme for Studies and Other Evidences. Results: The initial search yielded 552 references. Based on ab initio inclusion and exclusion criteria, 133 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and 21 articles were ultimately included in the systematic review. Due to study heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Existing burn-specific PROMs covered a range of biological, psychological, and social factors affecting adult and paediatric patients with burn injury, but several studies required additional PROMs for a thorough evaluation. Burn-specific PROM tools under development are poised to fill this deficit. Conclusion: Major burn injuries are a unique form of trauma, requiring coordinated man-agement that considers numerous factors not relevant to other patient populations. Further research is necessary to validate existing burn-specific PROM tools and to develop more comprehensive burn-specific PROM measures that more comprehensively incorporate the bio-psycho-social model of health.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Adult Burn Research
    Griffiths, Catrin
    Guest, Ella
    White, Paul
    Gaskin, Emma
    Rumsey, Nichola
    Pleat, Jonathan
    Harcourt, Diana
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2017, 38 (02): : E521 - E545
  • [2] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Allison Worth
    Victoria Hammersley
    Rebecca Knibb
    Bertine Flokstra-de-Blok
    Audrey DunnGalvin
    Samantha Walker
    Anthony E J Dubois
    Aziz Sheikh
    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 24
  • [3] Individualised patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review
    Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda
    Porter, Ian
    Bradley, Daniela G.
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Valderas, Jose M.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [4] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [6] Patient involvement in the development of asthma-specific patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review
    Frew, Edward
    Hankins, Matthew
    Smith, Helen E.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 132 (06) : 1434 - 1436
  • [7] Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Barello, Serena
    Anderson, Gloria
    Bosio, Caterina
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Leo, Donato G.
    Lobban, Trudie C. A.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [8] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty
    Barone, M.
    Cogliandro, A.
    Di Stefano, N.
    Tambone, V.
    Persichetti, P.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (04) : 1807 - 1811
  • [9] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric endocrinology
    McGee, Richard G.
    Zhang, Edward Y. B.
    Tan, Jennifer J. G.
    Cheung, Aiden C. K.
    Garvey, Matthew P.
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome measures in subarachnoid hemorrhage A systematic review
    Nobels-Janssen, Edith
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Verhagen, Wim I. M.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    Boogaarts, Jeroen D.
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (23) : 1096 - 1112