The spillover effect of SEC comment letters through audit firms

被引:0
|
作者
Bills, Kenneth L. [1 ]
Cating, Ryan [2 ]
Lin, Chenxi [3 ]
Seidel, Timothy A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Cent Arkansas, Coll Business, Conway, AR 72035 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Michael F Price Coll Business, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[4] Brigham Young Univ, BYU Marriott Sch Business, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
SEC; Comment letter; Spillover effect; Audit quality; Auditor competency; M41; M42; INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION; GOODWILL; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-023-09819-z
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines whether auditors serve as a conduit for disseminating Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) views on reporting and disclosure matters as the result of being privy to clients' SEC comment letters. This examination is important because auditors' involvement in and private access to clients' comment letters can enhance the timeliness of dissemination and constrain reporting or disclosure choices that diverge from SEC views. Among clients with a greater expectation of impaired goodwill that do not receive a comment letter with a goodwill-related comment, we find a greater likelihood of goodwill impairment when the audit firm serving the client is exposed to more goodwill-related comments received by other clients. Further examination of the channels of dissemination through the audit firm indicates that the results are driven by auditor exposure through other clients of the audit office in the same industry, the channel with the greatest exposure to the audit team, and clients in different audit offices in different industries, the channel with the broadest potential for spillover (i.e., the greatest number of other audit firm clients). Importantly, we observe these effects after controlling for alternative sources of spillover and when auditor comment letter exposure is not yet publicly available, suggesting that auditors' private access to client comment letters facilitates timely spillover. Further analyses indicate that spillover through industry clients within the audit office is also apparent in goodwill footnote disclosure.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 351
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Materiality of Accounting Errors: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters
    Acito, Andrew A.
    Burks, Jeffrey J.
    Johnson, W. Bruce
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (02) : 839 - 868
  • [22] Styles of Regulators: Evidence from the SEC's Comment Letters†
    Do, Truc Thuc
    Zhang, Huai
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 39 (02) : 789 - 825
  • [23] Responses to SEC comment letters on cybersecurity disclosures: An exploratory study
    Wang, Tawei
    Yen, Ju-Chun
    Yoon, Kyunghee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 46
  • [24] Financial comment letters, geographic proximity and audit quality
    Tang, Jing
    Liu, Chuyuan
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2024, 31 (02) : 196 - 220
  • [25] The Effects of Regulatory Scrutiny on Tax Avoidance: An Examination of SEC Comment Letters
    Kubick, Thomas R.
    Lynch, Daniel P.
    Mayberry, Michael A.
    Omer, Thomas C.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 91 (06): : 1751 - 1780
  • [26] Changes in corporate cybersecurity risk disclosures after SEC comment letters
    Calderon, Thomas G.
    Gao, Lei
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 41 (05)
  • [27] TRENDS IN SEC COMMENT LETTERS ON REGULATION S-K 1300
    Awuah-Offei, K.
    Offei, J.B.
    SME Annual Conference and Expo 2023, 2023,
  • [28] SEC Compensation-related Comment Letters and Excess CEO Compensation
    Wang, Weixiao
    Zhang, Lijuan
    Wilson, Mark
    Kala, Tejshree
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 31 (05) : 1089 - 1118
  • [29] Evaluating the SEC Review of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Comment Letters
    Valdivia, Victor
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2010, 30 (01): : 234 - 246
  • [30] The readability of company responses to SEC comment letters and SEC 10-K filing review outcomes
    Cory A. Cassell
    Lauren M. Cunningham
    Ling Lei Lisic
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2019, 24 : 1252 - 1276