Environmental insurance and green productivity: A firm-level evidence from China

被引:9
|
作者
Wen, Hong-xing [1 ]
Cui, Ting [1 ]
Wu, Xiao-qing [2 ]
Nie, Pu-yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Ctr Natl Econ Res, Sch Econ, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Dhurakij Pundit Univ, Coll Innovat Business & Accountancy, 110 1-4 Pra chachuen Rd, Bangkok, Thailand
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental pollution liability insurance; Green productivity; Financing constraints; Technological innovation; POLLUTION LIABILITY INSURANCE; FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS; PERFORMANCE; REGULATIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140482
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green transformation is currently a major challenge for both developed and developing economies, while the role of environmental insurance (EI) in green productivity in developing economies remains unclear. Using firm-level data from Chinese A-shape listed companies, this study investigates the relationship between EI on green total factor productivity (GTFP) along the period 2010-2019. To do so, a slack-based measurement model integrated with Global Malmquist-Luenberger approach (SBM-GML) is applied in GTFP calculation, and then a time-varying difference-in-difference (DID) setup is employed for empirical analysis, as well as its combination with pro-pensity score matching method (PSM-DID) to overcome the sample self-selection bias. We find that EI signifi-cantly promotes firm's GTFP by about 0.22 units, which is mainly driven by the improvement of technical efficiency rather than technological progress. Further analysis exploring channels suggests that EI promotes GTFP by alleviating financing constraints and stimulating green innovation. However, the heterogeneity analysis shows that both financing constraint mechanism and technological innovation mechanism are mainly observed in heavily polluting and non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs). Our findings provide a new insight for policy -makers that utilizing environmental insurance can promote green productivity, but which should be focused more on those enterprises who are difficult to absorb external financing and technological innovation resources.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of local gambling preferences on firm-level environmental violations: Evidence from China
    Zuo, Jingjing
    Qiu, Baoyin
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (02) : 1175 - 1190
  • [42] How productivity and credit constraints affect exports differently? Firm-level evidence from China
    Zhou, Tianhang
    Li, Xue
    Yan, Guo
    Li, Jie
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2022, 62 : 207 - 230
  • [43] How Do Tax Incentives Affect Investment and Productivity? Firm-Level Evidence from China
    Liu, Yongzheng
    Mao, Jie
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 11 (03) : 261 - 291
  • [44] The impacts of export VAT rebates on market switch and productivity: Firm-level evidence from China
    Gao, Yu
    He, Yin
    Yin, Xiaopeng
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2023, 46 (10): : 3116 - 3135
  • [45] Exporting and Environmental Performance: A Firm-level Productivity Analysis
    Galdeano-Gomez, Emilio
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2010, 33 (01): : 60 - 88
  • [46] Firm-level heterogeneous productivity and demand shocks: Evidence from Bangladesh
    Kee, Hiau Looi
    Krishna, Kala
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (02): : 457 - 462
  • [47] Intangible capital and productivity: Firm-level evidence from German manufacturing
    Kaus, Wolfhard
    Slavtchev, Viktor
    Zimmermann, Markus
    OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2023, 76 (04): : 970 - 996
  • [48] ICT solutions and labor productivity: evidence from firm-level data
    Juha-Miikka Nurmilaakso
    Electronic Commerce Research, 2009, 9 : 173 - 181
  • [49] Trade, productivity, and innovation: Firm-level evidence from Malaysian manufacturing
    Lee, Cassey
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2011, 22 (04) : 284 - 294
  • [50] Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment
    Bellemare, Charles
    Shearer, Bruce
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2009, 67 (01) : 233 - 244