Development and Practical Application of Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Selection of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers

被引:1
|
作者
Kotlars, Aleksandrs [1 ,2 ]
Skribans, Valerijs [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Kalnciema str 6, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[2] Transport & Telecommun Inst, Lomonosova str 1, LV-1019 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Logistics service providers; 3PL; Multi-attribute decision-making; Decision-making model;
D O I
10.2478/ttj-2023-0035
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
In this study a problematic of logistics service provider selection is discussed. Traditional decision-making techniques are functionally limited and must be adjusted. Modern approach must be based on contemporary tools and information. The aim of this study is to develop a modern, industry-oriented decision-making model for selection of strategic logistics service providers. Main tasks of this study include: to perform critical analysis and comparison of multiple-criteria decision-making methods; to adapt decision-making framework for specific needs of selection of third-party logistics service providers; to collect and analyze industry data related to procurement projects; to develop modern decision-making model for selection of logistics service providers; to perform practical application of developed decision-making model based on collected industry data. The key novelties of this study are developed methodology for collection of industry data for decision-making process, developed hybrid decision-making model for selection of third-party logistics service provider, as well as application of the model. As the result, there is developed decision-making model for selection of 3PL service providers that includes 6 steps.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 458
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Reputation Model for Third-Party Service Providers in Fog as a Service
    Chen, Nanxi
    Xu, Xiaobo
    Miao, Xuzhi
    ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES FOR PARALLEL PROCESSING, ICA3PP 2018, PT IV, 2018, 11337 : 591 - 599
  • [22] A Multi-Period Decision Making Procedure Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Selection Among Third-Party Logistics Providers
    Bali, Ozkan
    Gumus, Serkan
    Kaya, Ihsan
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 24 (5-6) : 547 - 569
  • [23] Selection Model for a Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider
    Yin, Zhihong
    Lu, Qiang
    Cui, Lili
    EIGHTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2009, : 2857 - 2861
  • [24] Study on the Third Party Logistics Supplier Selection Based on Group Decision-making
    Xiong Xianming
    Zhuo Lin
    Lu Yi
    INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND STRATEGY IN THE ERA OF INTERNET, 2016, : 409 - 417
  • [25] Selection of Third-Party Reverse Logistics Service Provider Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Song, Jiekun
    Jiang, Lina
    Liu, Zhicheng
    Leng, Xueli
    He, Zeguo
    SYSTEMS, 2022, 10 (05):
  • [26] A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics
    Senthil, S.
    Srirangacharyulu, B.
    Ramesh, A.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [27] A decision model for evaluating third-party logistics providers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Soh, SoonHu
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 4 (03): : 339 - 349
  • [28] DECISION-MAKING FOR SUBSTITUTABLE PRODUCTS IN A RETAILER DOMINANT CHANNEL INVOLVING A THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS PROVIDER
    Chen, Xiaoxu
    Xu, Peng
    Walker, Thomas
    Yang, Guoqiang
    Huang, Shengzhong
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2024, 20 (01) : 144 - 169
  • [29] Main Factor TOPSIS Analysis in Decision-making on the Efficiency of Third-party Reverse Logistics Enterprise
    Zhang Fengrong
    Fet, Annik Magerholm
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 CONFERENCE ON REGIONAL ECONOMY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, : 492 - +
  • [30] Third-party logistics in construction: perspectives from suppliers and transport service providers
    Ekeskar, Andreas
    Rudberg, Martin
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (9-10) : 831 - 846