Modeling Unsteady Surface Pressure Autospectra for Turbulent Boundary-Layer Flow over Small Dense Roughness

被引:1
|
作者
Catlett, M. Ryan [1 ]
Bryan, B. Skyler [1 ]
Chang, Natasha [1 ]
Hemingway, Hugh [1 ]
Anderson, Jason M. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Navy, Surface Warfare Ctr, Carderock Div, West Bethesda, MD 20817 USA
关键词
Boundary Layer Thickness; Wind Tunnel Tests; Streamwise Velocity; Signal Processing; Freestream Conditions; Surface Properties; Flow Conditions; Fluid Flow Properties; Fluid Mechanics; Warfare and Military Operations; STEP CHANGE; RESISTANCE; SPECTRUM; SMOOTH;
D O I
10.2514/1.J062643
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This work concentrates on analyzing and modeling the unsteady surface pressure autospectra beneath zero-pressure gradient, turbulent boundary-layer flowfields with variably rough flow surfaces. These surface conditions are qualitatively described as being for small, dense, rigid, spatially homogeneous roughness topologies, along with corresponding quantitative parameters. Turbulent boundary-layer velocity and unsteady surface pressure data from a new wind tunnel test with multiple surface conditions are analyzed in conjunction with the compiled results from five, distinct, additional references. These compiled results are utilized to develop and propose a new empirical model for the unsteady surface pressure autospectra for a range of variably rough surfaces. This new modeling framework is approached as an extension of the Goody model, which pertains to smooth-wall flows. The variable character of the newly proposed model is controlled by parameters based on viscous scaling of the effective roughness height and friction velocity such that the surface pressure model inputs are based on readily available mean properties of the turbulent boundary-layer flowfield. For the data utilized in this analysis the approximate values of viscous scaled effective roughness height range between approximately 100 and 2000. Finally, this newly proposed model is used to compare to the unsteady surface pressure data of two additional and separate experimental references for rough-wall flows, yielding further positive comparisons as well as isolated examples of the sensitivity of analysis and modeling to the determined friction velocity for a flow configuration.
引用
收藏
页码:5514 / 5531
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE RESPONSE OF A TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYER TO A SHORT LENGTH OF SURFACE-ROUGHNESS
    ANDREOPOULOS, J
    WOOD, DH
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1982, 118 (MAY) : 143 - 164
  • [22] EFFECT OF CROSS FLOW AND ROUGHNESS ON BOUNDARY-LAYER AND SURFACE PRESSURE-FLUCTUATIONS ON CYLINDERS
    WILLMARTH, WW
    INGLIS, S
    SHARMA, LK
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 21 (10): : 1221 - 1221
  • [23] Turbulent boundary-layer buoyant flow modeling over a wide Prandtl number range
    C. Varga
    S. Fohanno
    G. Polidori
    Acta Mechanica, 2004, 172 : 65 - 73
  • [24] Turbulent boundary-layer buoyant flow modeling over a wide Prandtl number range
    Varga, C
    Fohanno, S
    Polidori, G
    ACTA MECHANICA, 2004, 172 (1-2) : 65 - 73
  • [25] UNSTEADY HYDROMAGNETIC BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOW
    DEBNATH, L
    TENSOR, 1972, 23 (03): : 323 - 329
  • [26] BOUNDARY-LAYER SEPARATION IN UNSTEADY FLOW
    SEARS, WR
    TELIONIS, DP
    SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1975, 28 (01) : 215 - 235
  • [27] Influence of surface roughness on anisotropy in a turbulent boundary layer flow
    Keirsbulck, L
    Labraga, L
    Mazouz, A
    Tournier, C
    EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2002, 33 (03) : 497 - 499
  • [28] MOMENTARY STRUCTURE OF WALL PRESSURE OF A TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOW
    EMMERLING, R
    MEIER, GEA
    DINKELACKER, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND MECHANIK, 1974, 54 (04): : T113 - T114
  • [29] FLOW IN A TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER AFTER A CHANGE IN SURFACE ROUGHNESS
    TOWNSEND, AA
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1966, 26 : 255 - &
  • [30] Influence of surface roughness on anisotropy in a turbulent boundary layer flow
    Keirsbulck L.
    Labraga L.
    Mazouz A.
    Tournier C.
    Experiments in Fluids, 2002, 33 (3) : 497 - 499