Reproducibility of Femoropopliteal Artery Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

被引:2
|
作者
Soney, Hywel [1 ]
Kakkilaya, Akash [2 ]
Vazquez, David Fernandez [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Banerjee, Rahul [6 ]
Rosol, Zachary [3 ]
Tsai, Shirling [5 ]
Banerjee, Subhash [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Methodist Dallas Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX 75203 USA
[2] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Med, College Stn, TX USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Dallas Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
ANGIOGRAPHY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.04.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite increased use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during peripheral artery interphy is lacking. Forty cross-sectional IVUS images of the femoropopliteal artery from 20 Disease) registry who underwent peripheral artery interventions and met criteria based on IVUS consensus guidelines were independently assessed by 2 blinded readers. IVUS images from 6 patients (40 images) were selected for angiographic correlation and met criteria for identifiable landmarks (e.g., stent edge and bifurcation). Lumen cross-sectional area (CSA), external elastic membrane (EEM) CSA, luminal diameter, and reference vessel diameter were repeatedly measured. The Lumen CSA and EEM CSA intra-observer agreement by Spearman rank-order correlation (r) was >0.993, intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.997, and repeatability coefficient was <1.34. For the interobserver measurement of luminal CSA and EEM CSA, the r = 0.742 and 0.764; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.888 and 0.885; and repeatability coefficient = 7.24 and 11.34, respectively. A Bland-Altman plot for lumen and EEM CSA showed good reproducibility. For angiographic comparison, the r for luminal diameter, luminal area, and vessel area were 0.419, 0.414, and 0.649, respectively. Femoropopliteal IVUS measurements showed strong intraobserver and interobserver agreement; IVUS and angiographic measurements did not demonstrate a similar strong agreement. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The distribution of calcified nodule and plaque rupture in patients with peripheral artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound analysis
    Tetsuo Horimatsu
    Kenichi Fujii
    Masashi Fukunaga
    Kojiro Miki
    Machiko Nishimura
    Yoshiro Naito
    Masahiko Shibuya
    Takahiro Imanaka
    Kenji Kawai
    Hiroto Tamaru
    Akinori Sumiyoshi
    Ten Saita
    Tohru Masuyama
    Masaharu Ishihara
    Heart and Vessels, 2017, 32 : 1161 - 1168
  • [22] Elasticity imaging of artery walls with intravascular ultrasound
    Wan, MX
    Li, YM
    Li, JB
    Cui, YY
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 20, PTS 1-6: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TOWARDS THE YEAR 2000 AND BEYOND, 1998, 20 : 860 - 861
  • [23] Intravascular Imaging for Peripheral Artery Disease and Endovascular Intervention of the Lower Extremities
    Frank A. Medina
    Maxime Dubosq-Lebaz
    Joseph M. Kim
    Eric A. Secemsky
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2025, 18 (1)
  • [24] Adventitial Cystic Disease in the Popliteal Artery Diagnosed by Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging
    Miyauchi, Eiji
    Okui, Hideki
    Yuasa, Toshinori
    Oketani, Naoya
    Ohishi, Mitsuru
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [25] Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging for Assessing Regression and Progression in Coronary Artery Disease
    Kaneda, Hideaki
    Ako, Junya
    Terashima, Mitsuyasu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (12): : 1735 - 1746
  • [26] Prognostic Value of Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
    Schuurman, Anne-Sophie
    Vroegindewey, Maxime M.
    Kardys, Isabella
    Oemrawsingh, Rohit M.
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    van Geuns, Robert-Jan
    Regar, Evelyn
    Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    Ligthart, Jurgen
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Boersma, Eric
    Akkerhuis, K. Martijn
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (17) : 2003 - 2011
  • [27] Reproducibility of serial intravascular ultrasound measurements in patients with angiographically silent coronary artery disease after heart transplantation
    Bocksch, W
    Wellnhofer, E
    Schartl, M
    Dreysse, S
    Klimek, W
    Franke, R
    Musci, M
    Hetzer, R
    Fleck, E
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2000, 11 (07) : 555 - 562
  • [28] Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Guagliumi, Giulio
    LANCET, 2017, 390 (10096): : 793 - 809
  • [29] INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IMAGING OF ANGIOGRAPHICALLY NORMAL CORONARY SEGMENTS IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    ALFONSO, F
    MACAYA, C
    GOICOLEA, J
    INIGUEZ, A
    HERNANDEZ, R
    ZAMORANO, J
    PEREZVIZCAYNE, MJ
    ZARCO, P
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1994, 127 (03) : 536 - 544
  • [30] The Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound on Femoropopliteal Artery Endovascular Interventions A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Allan, Richard B.
    Puckridge, Phillip J.
    Spark, J. Ian
    Delaney, Christopher L.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (05) : 536 - 546