A comparative study on daily evapotranspiration estimation by using various artificial intelligence techniques and traditional regression calculations

被引:1
|
作者
Guzel, Hasan [1 ]
Unes, Fatih [1 ]
Erginer, Merve [1 ]
Kaya, Yunus Ziya [2 ]
Tasar, Bestami [1 ]
Erginer, Ibrahim [1 ]
Demirci, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Iskenderun Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hatay, Turkiye
[2] Osmaniye Korkut Ata Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Osmaniye, Turkiye
关键词
Evapotranspiration; Fuzzy-SMRGT; ANN; MR; ANFIS; SMOReg; PREDICTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.3934/mbe.2023502
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Evapotranspiration is an important parameter to be considered in hydrology. In the design of water structures, accurate estimation of the amount of evapotranspiration allows for safer designs. Thus, maximum efficiency can be obtained from the structure. In order to accurately estimate evapotranspiration, the parameters affecting evapotranspiration should be well known. There are many factors that affect evapotranspiration. Some of these can be listed as temperature, humidity in the atmosphere, wind speed, pressure and water depth. In this study, models were created for the estimation of the daily evapotranspiration amount by using the simple membership functions and fuzzy rules generation technique (fuzzy-SMRGT), multivariate regression (MR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector regression (SMOReg) methods. Model results were compared with each other and traditional regression calculations. The ET amount was calculated empirically using the Penman-Monteith (PM) method which was taken as a reference equation. In the created models, daily air temperature (T), wind speed (WS), solar radiation (SR), relative humidity (H) and evapotranspiration (ET) data were obtained from the station near Lake Lewisville (Texas, USA). The coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and average percentage error (APE) were used to compare the model results. According to the performance criteria, the best model was obtained by Q-MR (quadratic-MR), ANFIS and ANN methods. The R2, RMSE, APE values of the best models were 0,991, 0,213, 18,881% for Q-MR; 0,996; 0,103; 4,340% for ANFIS and 0,998; 0,075; 3,361% for ANN, respectively. The Q-MR, ANFIS and ANN models had slightly better performance than the MLR, P-MR and SMOReg models.
引用
收藏
页码:11328 / 11352
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for the Diagnosis of Chronic Nerve Diseases
    Aljaloud, Saud
    Alshudukhi, Jalawi
    Alhamazani, Khalid Twarish
    Belay, Assaye
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, 2022
  • [22] Comparative study of predicting hospital solid waste generation using multiple linear regression and artificial intelligence
    Golbaz, Somayeh
    Nabizadeh, Ramin
    Sajadi, Haniye Sadat
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [23] Hybrid deep learning techniques for estimation of daily crop evapotranspiration using limited climate data
    Sharma, Gitika
    Singh, Ashima
    Jain, Sushma
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 202
  • [24] Comparative study of predicting hospital solid waste generation using multiple linear regression and artificial intelligence
    Somayeh Golbaz
    Ramin Nabizadeh
    Haniye Sadat Sajadi
    Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2019, 17 : 41 - 51
  • [25] Rainfall forecasting in upper Indus basin using various artificial intelligence techniques
    Muhammad Hammad
    Muhammad Shoaib
    Hamza Salahudin
    Muhammad Azhar Inam Baig
    Mudasser Muneer Khan
    Muhammad Kaleem Ullah
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021, 35 : 2213 - 2235
  • [26] Rainfall forecasting in upper Indus basin using various artificial intelligence techniques
    Hammad, Muhammad
    Shoaib, Muhammad
    Salahudin, Hamza
    Baig, Muhammad Azhar Inam
    Khan, Mudasser Muneer
    Ullah, Muhammad Kaleem
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (11) : 2213 - 2235
  • [27] Reliability comparison of a fabricated humidity sensor using various artificial intelligence techniques
    Bhargava C.
    Banga V.K.
    Singh Y.
    Bhargava, Cherry (cherry_bhargav@yahoo.co.in), 1600, Totem Publishers Ltd (13): : 577 - 586
  • [28] Daily Suspended Sediment Prediction Using Seasonal Time Series and Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Unes, Fatih
    Tasar, Bestami
    Demirci, Mustafa
    Zelenakova, Martina
    Kaya, Yunus Ziya
    Varcin, Hakan
    ROCZNIK OCHRONA SRODOWISKA, 2021, 23 : 117 - 137
  • [29] Estimation of hourly and daily evapotranspiration and soil moisture using downscaled LST over various urban surfaces
    Jiang, Yitong
    Weng, Qihao
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 54 (01) : 95 - 117
  • [30] US Road Sign Detection and Visibility Estimation using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Abukhait, Jafar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01) : 604 - 613