A comparative study on daily evapotranspiration estimation by using various artificial intelligence techniques and traditional regression calculations

被引:1
|
作者
Guzel, Hasan [1 ]
Unes, Fatih [1 ]
Erginer, Merve [1 ]
Kaya, Yunus Ziya [2 ]
Tasar, Bestami [1 ]
Erginer, Ibrahim [1 ]
Demirci, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Iskenderun Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hatay, Turkiye
[2] Osmaniye Korkut Ata Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Osmaniye, Turkiye
关键词
Evapotranspiration; Fuzzy-SMRGT; ANN; MR; ANFIS; SMOReg; PREDICTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.3934/mbe.2023502
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Evapotranspiration is an important parameter to be considered in hydrology. In the design of water structures, accurate estimation of the amount of evapotranspiration allows for safer designs. Thus, maximum efficiency can be obtained from the structure. In order to accurately estimate evapotranspiration, the parameters affecting evapotranspiration should be well known. There are many factors that affect evapotranspiration. Some of these can be listed as temperature, humidity in the atmosphere, wind speed, pressure and water depth. In this study, models were created for the estimation of the daily evapotranspiration amount by using the simple membership functions and fuzzy rules generation technique (fuzzy-SMRGT), multivariate regression (MR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector regression (SMOReg) methods. Model results were compared with each other and traditional regression calculations. The ET amount was calculated empirically using the Penman-Monteith (PM) method which was taken as a reference equation. In the created models, daily air temperature (T), wind speed (WS), solar radiation (SR), relative humidity (H) and evapotranspiration (ET) data were obtained from the station near Lake Lewisville (Texas, USA). The coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and average percentage error (APE) were used to compare the model results. According to the performance criteria, the best model was obtained by Q-MR (quadratic-MR), ANFIS and ANN methods. The R2, RMSE, APE values of the best models were 0,991, 0,213, 18,881% for Q-MR; 0,996; 0,103; 4,340% for ANFIS and 0,998; 0,075; 3,361% for ANN, respectively. The Q-MR, ANFIS and ANN models had slightly better performance than the MLR, P-MR and SMOReg models.
引用
收藏
页码:11328 / 11352
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative study of various artificial intelligence techniques to predict software quality
    Khan, Malik Jahan
    Shamail, Shafay
    Awais, Mian Muhammad
    Hussain, Tauqeer
    10TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL MULTITOPIC CONFERENCE 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 173 - +
  • [2] Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation using Linear Regression and ANN Models
    P. Mallikarjuna
    S. A. Jyothy
    K. C. Sekhar Reddy
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2012, 93 (4) : 215 - 221
  • [3] Recent Advances in Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Artificial Intelligence Approaches with a Focus on Hybridization Techniques-A Review
    Chia, Min Yan
    Huang, Yuk Feng
    Koo, Chai Hoon
    Fung, Kit Fai
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence in Age Estimation: a Comparative Study
    Ammous, Donia
    Kammoun, Fahmi
    Masmoudi, Nouri
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES, ICASET 2024, 2024,
  • [5] Comparative study of evapotranspiration losses using various algorithms
    Teja, Tarun
    Mandla, Venkata Ravibabu
    Vuppaladadiyam, Arun K.
    International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2012, 5 (6 SPECIAL ISSUE 1): : 1683 - 1691
  • [6] Soybean crop yield estimation using artificial intelligence techniques
    Bandeira, Poliana Maria da Costa
    Villar, Flora Maria de Melo
    Pinto, Francisco de Assis de Carvalho
    da Silva, Felipe Lopes
    Bandeira, Priscila Pascali da Costa
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2024, 46
  • [7] River Flow Estimation Using Artificial Intelligence and Fuzzy Techniques
    Unes, Fatih
    Demirci, Mustafa
    Zelenakova, Martina
    Calisici, Mustafa
    Tasar, Bestami
    Vranay, Frantisek
    Kaya, Yunus Ziya
    WATER, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [8] Data-driven reference evapotranspiration (ET0) estimation: a comparative study of regression and machine learning techniques
    Jitendra Rajput
    Man Singh
    K. Lal
    Manoj Khanna
    A. Sarangi
    J. Mukherjee
    Shrawan Singh
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, 26 : 12679 - 12706
  • [9] A comparative study of DC servo motor parameter estimation using various techniques
    Batool, Ashna
    ul Ain, Noor
    Amin, Arslan Ahmed
    Adnan, Muhammad
    Shahbaz, Muhammad Hamza
    AUTOMATIKA, 2022, 63 (02) : 303 - 312
  • [10] Data-driven reference evapotranspiration (ET0) estimation: a comparative study of regression and machine learning techniques
    Rajput, Jitendra
    Singh, Man
    Lal, K.
    Khanna, Manoj
    Sarangi, A.
    Mukherjee, J.
    Singh, Shrawan
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (05) : 12679 - 12706