Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater

被引:1
|
作者
Alharthi, Mamdouh S. [1 ]
Bamaga, Omar [2 ]
Abulkhair, Hani [1 ,2 ]
Organji, Husam [2 ]
Shaiban, Amer [2 ]
Macedonio, Francesca [3 ]
Criscuoli, Alessandra [3 ]
Drioli, Enrico [3 ]
Wang, Zhaohui [4 ]
Cui, Zhaoliang [4 ]
Jin, Wanqin [4 ]
Albeirutty, Mohammed [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Mech Engn, POB 80200, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Excellence Desalinat Technol, POB 80200, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[3] Natl Res Council Italy CNR ITM, Inst Membrane Technol, Via P Bucci 17-C, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Italy
[4] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Chem Engn, State Key Lab Mat Oriented Chem Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
关键词
industrial wastewater; moving bed biofilm reactor; membrane bioreactor; membrane distillation; hybrid process; SALINITY; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; DRIVERS; REUSE; MBR;
D O I
10.3390/membranes13010016
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Integrated wastewater treatment processes are accepted as the best option for sustainable and unrestricted onsite water reuse. In this study, moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), membrane bioreactor (MBR), and direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) treatment steps were integrated successively to obtain the combined advantages of these processes for industrial wastewater treatment. The MBBR step acts as the first step in the biological treatment and also mitigates foulant load on the MBR. Similarly, MBR acts as the second step in the biological treatment and serves as a pretreatment prior to the DCMD step. The latter acts as a final treatment to produce high-quality water. A laboratory scale integrated MBBR/MBR/DCMD experimental system was used for assessing the treatment efficiency of primary treated (PTIWW) and secondary treated (STIWW) industrial wastewater in terms of permeate water flux, effluent quality, and membrane fouling. The removal efficiency of total dissolved solids (TDS) and effluent permeate flux of the three-step process (MBBR/MBR/DCMD) were better than the two-step (MBR/DCMD) process. In the three-step process, the average removal efficiency of TDS was 99.85% and 98.16% when treating STIWW and PTIWW, respectively. While in the case of the two-step process, the average removal efficiency of TDS was 93.83% when treating STIWW. Similar trends were observed for effluent permeate flux values which were found, in the case of the three-step process, 62.6% higher than the two-step process, when treating STIWW in both cases. Moreover, the comparison of the quality of the effluents obtained with the analysed configurations with that obtained by Jeddah Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant proved the higher performance of the proposed membrane processes.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thermal analysis evaluation of direct contact membrane distillation system
    Elmarghany, Mohamed R.
    El-Shazly, Ahmed H.
    Salem, Mohamed S.
    Sabry, Mohamed Nabil
    Nady, Norhan
    CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 13
  • [22] Performance Comparison of Conventional Membrane Bioreactor and Moving Bed Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Synthetic Textile Wastewater
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 528 - 532
  • [23] Evaluation of textile wastewater treatment in sequential anaerobic moving bed bioreactor-aerobic membrane bioreactor
    Kozak, Melike
    Cirik, Kevser
    Dolaz, Mustafa
    Basak, Serden
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 105 : 62 - 71
  • [24] Comparative study on membrane fouling between membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor and conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment
    Yang, W.
    Syed, W.
    Zhou, H.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 69 (05) : 1021 - 1027
  • [25] A review on the present situation of wastewater treatment in textile industry with membrane bioreactor and moving bed biofilm reactor
    Yang, Xuefei
    Crespi, Marti
    Lopez-Grimau, Victor
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 103 : 315 - 322
  • [26] Impacts of sulfadiazine on the performance and membrane fouling of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system at different C/N ratios
    Zhang, Xinbo
    Zhang, Zumin
    Liu, Ying
    Huu Hao Ngo
    Guo, Wenshan
    Wang, Huizhong
    Zhang, Yufeng
    Zhang, Dan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 318
  • [27] Hybrid System Coupling Moving Bed Bioreactor with UV/O3 Oxidation and Membrane Separation Units for Treatment of Industrial Laundry Wastewater
    Mozia, Sylwia
    Janus, Magdalena
    Bering, Slawomira
    Tarnowski, Krzysztof
    Mazur, Jacek
    Szymanski, Kacper
    Morawski, Antoni W.
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (11)
  • [28] Effect of hydraulic retention time on the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system for micropollutants removal from municipal wastewater
    Jiang, Qi
    Ngo, Hao H.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Hai, Faisal I.
    Price, William E.
    Zhang, Jian
    Liang, Shuang
    Deng, Lijuan
    Guo, Wenshan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 247 : 1228 - 1232
  • [29] Kinetic study of the combined processes of a membrane bioreactor and a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor with advanced oxidation processes as a post-treatment stage for wastewater treatment
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Lopez-Lopez, C.
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Munio, M. M.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2015, 91 : 57 - 66
  • [30] Treatment of anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) effluent using direct contact membrane distillation
    Chen, Lin
    Liu, Chang
    Cao, Chuqing
    Zhu, Liang
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 65 : 89 - 97