A study of licensing strategies for energy storage technologies in the renewable electricity supply chain under government subsidies

被引:3
|
作者
Ma, Xiaochen [1 ]
Pan, Yanchun [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Manzi [2 ,3 ]
Ma, Jianhua [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Wen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, China Ctr Special Econ Zone Res, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Management, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Ctr Modeling & Optimizat Complex Management Syst C, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
关键词
Government subsidy; Game model; Technology licensing; Renewable energy; Electricity supply chain; GAME-THEORETIC APPROACH; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138343
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the rapid spread of renewable electricity, the licensing of energy storage technology has become important way for technologically backward electricity suppliers to improve their competitiveness electricity market. However, there have been few studies that have investigated the influence of government policy on the selection of licensing strategies for energy storage technologies by renewable electricity suppliers. Consequently, we constructed a game model involving two competing renewable electricity suppliers, the company, and the government. One of them is a technologically advanced electricity supplier, and the is a technologically backward one. The model considers government subsidies and compares three licensing strategies: technology monopolies (TM), unit-production authorization (UA), and fixed-fee authorization Based on numerical analysis, this paper compares wholesale electricity prices, grid orders and grid government profits under different licensing strategies. Next, the choice of the optimal licensing strategy electricity suppliers and the preferences of the grid and the government for different licensing strategies analyzed. The results show that wholesale electricity prices increase and grid orders decrease under the strategy compared to the TM strategy, while the opposite is true under the FA strategy. The FA strategy preferred between electricity suppliers when the cost of generation from technologically advanced suppliers exceeds twice the cost of generation from technologically inferior suppliers. Otherwise, the UA strategy more appropriate. Moreover, the grid and government preferred the FA strategy to the TM or UA strategy, with profits rising 89% and 26% for the grid and government respectively under this strategy. Lastly, the is more profitable under the UA strategy than under the TM strategy only if the level of electricity reliability and grid cost are higher.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pricing, greening, and recycling decisions of capital-constrained closed-loop supply chain with government subsidies under financing strategies
    Chen, Jianhui
    Tian, Yan
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    Tang, Huajun
    Che, Pak Hou
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 438
  • [32] Effectiveness Verification of Energy Storage Systems toward Stable Electricity Supply with 100% Variable Renewable Energy
    Fujioka, Hanako
    Yamamoto, Hiromi
    Okano, Kunihiko
    2018 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS (ICPES), 2018, : 60 - 64
  • [33] Financing strategies for coal-electricity supply chain under yield uncertainty
    Guo Zhiyuan
    Zhou Meihua
    Peng Hongjun
    International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2018, 28 (02) : 353 - 358
  • [34] Financing strategies for coal-electricity supply chain under yield uncertainty
    Guo Zhiyuan
    Zhou Meihua
    Peng Hongjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 353 - 358
  • [35] The Strategies of the Poverty-Alleviation Supply Chain with Government Subsidies and Cost Sharing: Government-Led or Market-Oriented?
    Kang, Kai
    Luan, Xinfeng
    Shen, Wenjing
    Ma, Yanfang
    Wei, Xuguang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [36] Market Design and Trading Strategies for Community Energy Markets with Storage and Renewable Supply
    Alabdullatif, Abdullah M.
    Gerding, Enrico H.
    Perez-Diaz, Alvaro
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (04)
  • [37] Redesign Electricity Market for the Next Generation Power System of Renewable Energy and Distributed Storage Technologies
    Feng, Donghan
    Xu, Zhao
    Ostergaard, Jacob
    IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING 2010, 2010,
  • [38] Biodegradable waste to renewable energy conversion under a sustainable energy supply chain management
    Sarkar, Mitali
    Seo, Yong Won
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (04) : 6993 - 7019
  • [39] The Impacts of Government Subsidies and Consumer Preferences on Food Supply Chain Traceability under Different Power Structures
    Xue, Weixia
    Xu, Zhiduan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [40] A Green Supply-Chain Decision Model for Energy-Saving Products That Accounts for Government Subsidies
    Xue, Jian
    Gong, Ruifeng
    Zhao, Laijun
    Ji, Xiaoqing
    Xu, Yan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):