RESCUE BT 2, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial of intravenous tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke: Study rationale and design

被引:3
|
作者
Zi, Wenjie [1 ,2 ]
Song, Jiaxing [1 ,2 ]
Qiu, Zhongming [1 ,2 ]
Kong, Weilin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Jiacheng [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Weidong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Sang, Hongfei [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Linyu [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jinrong [1 ,2 ]
Saver, Jeffrey L. [3 ]
Nogueira, Raul G. [4 ]
Li, Fengli [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Qingwu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Army Med Univ, Xinqiao Hosp, Dept Neurol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Army Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, UPMC Stroke Inst, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIa inhibitor; tirofiban; acute ischemic stroke; randomized controlled trial; GLYCOPROTEIN IIB/IIIA RECEPTOR; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; EARLY MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; OCCLUSION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1177/17474930221122681
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Tirofiban is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor that has been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. However, it remains unknown whether it improves outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Objective: This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of tirofiban compared with aspirin for acute ischemic stroke within 24 h after symptom onset. Methods and design: The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Compared with Aspirin in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke (RESCUE BT 2) Trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multi-center clinical trial. Up to 1158 eligible patients will be consecutively randomized to receive antiplatelet therapy with tirofiban or aspirin in 1:1 ratio across approximately 100 stroke centers in China. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with excellent functional outcomes defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days after randomization. Lead safety endpoints include mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 48 h after treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 625
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Randomized Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Trial of Azasetron versus Ondansetron to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in the Prevention of Delayed Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Chemotherapy
    Lee, Hee Yeon
    Kim, Hoon-Kyo
    Lee, Kyung Hee
    Kim, Bong-Seog
    Song, Hong Suk
    Yang, Sung Hyun
    Kim, Joon Hee
    Kim, Yeul Hong
    Kim, Jong Gwang
    Kim, Sang-We
    Kim, Dong-Wan
    Kim, Si-Young
    Park, Hee Sook
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 46 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [42] A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial of voriconazole and fluconazole in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients (vol 33, pg 1447, 2001)
    Ally, R
    Schürmann, D
    Kreisel, W
    Carosi, G
    Aguirrebengoa, K
    Dupont, B
    Hodges, M
    Troke, P
    Romero, AJ
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (02) : 309 - 309
  • [43] Nebulized arformoterol in patients with COPD: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled trial
    Baumgartner, Rudolf A.
    Hanania, Nicola A.
    Calhoun, William J.
    Sahn, Steven A.
    Sciarappa, Kenneth
    Hanrahan, John P.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (02) : 261 - 278
  • [44] Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Trial of a Herbal Preparation of Myrrh, Camomile and Coffee Coal Compared to Mesalamine in Maintaining Remission in Ulcerative Colitis
    Langhorst, Jost
    Varnhagen, Ines
    Schneider, Berthold
    Goos, Karl-Heinz
    Albrecht, Uwe W.
    Rueffer, Andreas
    Stange, Rainer
    Michalsen, Andreas
    Dobos, Gustav J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S264 - S264
  • [45] Intravenous zanamivir or oral oseltamivir for hospitalised patients with influenza: an international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial
    Marty, Francisco M.
    Vidal-Puigserver, Joan
    Clark, Carol
    Gupta, Sandeep K.
    Merino, Esperanza
    Garot, Denis
    Chapman, Marianne J.
    Jacobs, Frederique
    Rodriguez-Noriega, Eduardo
    Husa, Petr
    Shortino, Denise
    Watson, Helen A.
    Yates, Phillip J.
    Peppercorn, Amanda F.
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (02): : 135 - 146
  • [46] Syzygium cumini (L.) skeels in the treatment of type 2 diabetes -: Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial
    Teixeira, CC
    Weinert, LS
    Barbosa, DC
    Ricken, C
    Esteves, JF
    Fuchs, FD
    DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (12) : 3019 - 3020
  • [47] Effect of an Echinacea-Based Hot Drink Versus Oseltamivir in Influenza Treatment: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Noninferiority Clinical Trial
    Raus, Karel
    Pleschka, Stephan
    Klein, Peter
    Schoop, Roland
    Fisher, Peter
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2015, 77 : 66 - 72
  • [48] The analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of epidural oxycodone after gynaecological laparotomy: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparison with intravenous administration
    Piirainen, Panu
    Kokki, Hannu
    Hautajarvi, Heidi
    Ranta, Veli-Pekka
    Kokki, Merja
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 84 (09) : 2088 - 2096
  • [49] A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, prospective pilot study of the partial Mu opiate agonist, buprenorphine, for acute detoxification from heroin
    Oreskovich, MR
    Saxon, AJ
    Ellis, MLK
    Malte, CA
    Reoux, JP
    Knox, PC
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2005, 77 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of patients with rosacea: A multicenter, randomized, double- blind, double-dummy, pilot study
    Wang, Ben
    Yuan, Xin
    Huang, Xin
    Tang, Yan
    Zhao, Zhixiang
    Yang, Bin
    Yang, Baoqi
    Zheng, Yue
    Yuan, Chao
    Xie, Hongfu
    Li, Ji
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 84 (02) : 543 - 545