Evaluation of Czech hop varieties (Humulus lupulus L.) in a dry area without irrigation

被引:0
|
作者
Nesvadba, Vladimir [1 ]
Klas, Miloslav [2 ]
Charvatova, Jitka [1 ]
Trnkova, Sabina [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Res Inst, Kadanska 2525, Zatec 43801, Czech Republic
[2] Agr Co Chrastany Ltd, Chrastany 172, Knezeves 27001, Czech Republic
来源
KVASNY PRUMYSL | 2023年 / 69卷 / 05期
关键词
Humulus lupulus L; yield; hop resins; hop aroma; variability;
D O I
10.18832/kp2023.69.803
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the difference in performance and variability of selected Czech hop varieties in a dry location without available irrigation. Since 2017, a field experiment has been conducted with 11 Czech hop varieties. The time series of the results helped to show the differences in performance as well as variability between the varieties. The highest yields were achieved by the Uran variety (2.83 t/ha) and Saaz Shine variety (2.76 t/ha), which also exhibited the lowest yield variability, namely 11.17% (Saaz Shine) and 12.53% (Uran), respectively. The lowest hop yield was recorded by the Harmonie variety (1.17 t/ha), which at the same time showed high yield variability (30.92%). The Bohemie variety had the highest yield variability of hops at 35.26%. Furthermore, the Gaia (14.66% w/w) and Uran (13.53% w/w) varieties had the highest alpha acid content. Conversely, the Mimosa variety showed the lowest alpha acid content (1.56% w/w) and also the lowest alpha/beta acid ratio (0.29). The Rubin variety reached the highest alpha/beta acid ratio (3.00). The Uran variety exhibited the lowest variability in alpha (6.16%) and beta (6.28%) acid content and in contrast, the Harmonie variety had the highest variability in these parameters (59.02% for alpha acids and 38.18% for beta acids). The Uran and Saaz Shine varieties showed a very good tolerance to dryness in the dry area. Additionally, the Gaia and Saaz Brilliant varieties showed good performance parameters, i.e. yield and hop resins. The hop varieties Vital, Gaia, Saaz Brilliant, and Saaz Shine had the most intense hop aroma, while the Boomerang and Uran varieties had a high intensity of spicy aroma. The Uran and Saaz Shine are highly resistant to drought.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 810
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A TRISOMIC HOP HUMULUS LUPULUS L
    HAUNOLD, A
    CROP SCIENCE, 1968, 8 (04) : 503 - &
  • [22] Methodical aspects of hop (Humulus lupulus L.) genetic transformation
    Oriniaková, P
    Pavingerová, D
    Matousek, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1999, 45 (05): : 219 - 227
  • [23] High throughput isolation of microsatellites in hop (Humulus lupulus L.)
    Jernej Jakše
    Branka Javornik
    Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2001, 19 : 217 - 226
  • [24] Development of a shoot multiplication system for hop (Humulus lupulus L.)
    Roy, AT
    Leggett, G
    Koutoulis, A
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2001, 37 (01) : 79 - 83
  • [25] Marker-assisted hop (Humulus lupulus L.) breeding
    Kralj, D
    Kao, M
    Dolinar, M
    Zolnir, M
    Kralj, S
    MONATSSCHRIFT FUR BRAUWISSENSCHAFT, 1998, 51 (7-8): : 111 - 119
  • [26] Influence of weather conditions, irrigation and plant age on yield and alpha-acids content of Czech hop (Humulus lupulus L.) cultivars
    Donner, Pavel
    Pokorny, Jaroslav
    Jezek, Josef
    Krofta, Karel
    Patzak, Josef
    Pulkrabek, Josef
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 66 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [28] Antioxidant Activity of Different Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) Genotypes
    Kolenc, Zala
    Hribernik, Tamara
    Langerholc, Tomaz
    Pintaric, Masa
    Povse, Maja Prevolnik
    Bren, Urban
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (19):
  • [29] Bifunctional activities of valerophenone synthase in hop (Humulus lupulus L.)
    Okada, Y
    Yamazaki, Y
    Suh, DY
    Sankawa, U
    Ito, K
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREWING CHEMISTS, 2001, 59 (04) : 163 - 166
  • [30] Development of a shoot multiplication system for hop (Humulus lupulus L.)
    Ashis Taru Roy
    Grey Leggett
    Anthony Koutoulis
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2001, 37 : 79 - 83