A Hierarchical Game-Theoretic Decision-Making for Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems Under the Presence of Adversarial Agents

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Qin [1 ]
Parasuraman, Ramviyas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Comp Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Multi-Agent Systems; Game-Theoretic; Hierarchical Decomposition; Agent Needs; Cooperative; Adversaries;
D O I
10.1145/3555776.3577642
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Underlying relationships among Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) in hazardous scenarios can be represented as Game-theoretic models. This paper proposes a new hierarchical network-based model called Game-theoretic Utility Tree (GUT), which decomposes high-level strategies into executable low-level actions for cooperative MAS decisions. It combines with a new payoff measure based on agent needs for real-time strategy games. We present an Explore game domain, where we measure the performance of MAS achieving tasks from the perspective of balancing the success probability and system costs. We evaluate the GUT approach against state-of-the-art methods that greedily rely on rewards of the composite actions. Conclusive results on extensive numerical simulations indicate that GUT can organize more complex relationships among MAS cooperation, helping the group achieve challenging tasks with lower costs and higher winning rates. Furthermore, we demonstrated the applicability of the GUT using the simulator-hardware testbed - Robotarium. The performances verified the effectiveness of the GUT in the real robot application and validated that the GUT could effectively organize MAS cooperation strategies, helping the group with fewer advantages achieve higher performance.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 782
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decision-Making in Committees: Game-Theoretic Analysis-Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
    McGonigal, F.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2012, 63 (05) : 700 - 701
  • [42] Prospect Theoretic Utility Based Human Decision Making in Multi-Agent Systems
    Geng, Baocheng
    Brahma, Swastik
    Wimalajeewa, Thakshila
    Varshney, Pramod K.
    Rangaswamy, Muralidhar
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2020, 68 : 1091 - 1104
  • [43] Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Socio-Physical System
    Cullen, Andrew
    Alpcan, Tansu
    Kalloniatis, Alexander
    DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2024,
  • [44] A cooperative jamming decision-making method based on multi-agent reinforcement learning
    Bingchen Cai
    Haoran Li
    Naimin Zhang
    Mingyu Cao
    Han Yu
    Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 5 (1):
  • [45] Learning Cooperative Behaviours in Adversarial Multi-agent Systems
    Wang, Ni
    Das, Gautham P.
    Millard, Alan G.
    TOWARDS AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, TAROS 2022, 2022, 13546 : 179 - 189
  • [46] Fairness in Multi-Agent Sequential Decision-Making
    Zhang, Chongjie
    Shah, Julie A.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 27 (NIPS 2014), 2014, 27
  • [47] A Game-Theoretic Incentive Mechanism for Multi-Distributor Multi-Agent Federated Learning
    Yang, Jian
    Zhu, Mingkai
    Zhou, Yan
    Zhang, Qingrui
    Ni, Yiyang
    2024 IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE, WCNC 2024, 2024,
  • [48] A hybrid approach to multi-agent decision-making
    Trigo, Paulo
    Coelho, Helder
    ECAI 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 178 : 413 - +
  • [49] Fast and Flexible Multi-Agent Decision-Making
    Leonard, Naomi Ehrich
    2023 62ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, CDC, 2023, : 2 - 2
  • [50] Towards flexible multi-agent decision-making under time pressure
    Noh, S
    Gmytrasiewicz, PJ
    IJCAI-99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 & 2, 1999, : 492 - 498