Regional inequalities and transnational solidarity in the European Union

被引:6
|
作者
Reinl, Ann-Kathrin [1 ]
Nicoli, Francesco [1 ,3 ]
Kuhn, Theresa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Publ Governance & Management, Campus Rommelaere,Apotheekstr 5, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Amsterdam, European Studies Dept, Kloveniersburgwal 48, NL-1000 BP Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Politecn Torino, Dept Management & Prod Engn, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
基金
比利时弗兰德研究基金会;
关键词
PUBLIC SUPPORT; REDISTRIBUTION; PREFERENCES; INTEGRATION; ALLOCATION; AUTHORITY; COUNTRIES; IDEOLOGY; DIVIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102903
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Amid the eurocrisis, scholars and policy makers sought to establish an EU-wide layer of social policy, aiming to ensure common standards through the EU and to provide a degree of common social protection. While public support for European social policy has been extensively studied, we don't know how regional (i.e., subnational) inequalities relate to preferences for European social policy. We analyse the effect of regional differences in socio-economic and institutional contexts on public preferences for European social policy in general and support for European unemployment insurance in particular. Combining original survey data collected in 2018 in 12 European countries with regional-level economic and political indicators, we find that regional-level self-interest impacts individual preferences but that the effect is not always clear-cut. Contrary to expectations, people in richer regions are more supportive of EU social policy than people in poorer regions, while citizens of politically more autonomous regions tend to have a generally more positive view of EU social policy. A conjoint experiment on support for different policy variants of European unemployment insurance sheds light on these counterintuitive findings: Citizens in richer regions are indeed more supportive of EU-level social policy, but only when it has limited redistributive implications and instead affects standards; conversely citizens in poorer regions are willing to forego their op-position to EU social policy for redistributive programs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transnational migration of health professionals in the European Union
    Gerlinger, Thomas
    Schmucker, Rolf
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2007, 23 : S184 - S192
  • [42] Regional mobility in the European union
    Ezcurra, Roberto
    Pascual, Pedro
    Rapun, Manuel
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2006, 38 (19) : 2237 - 2253
  • [43] Regional competition in the European Union
    Abraham, F
    REGIONAL COMPETITION, 2000, : 247 - 259
  • [44] REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Tijanic, Lela
    Obadic, Alka
    4. MEDUNARODNI ZNANSTVENI SIMPOZIJ GOSPODARSTVO ISTOCNE HRVATSKE - VIZIJA I RAZVOJ, 2015, : 768 - 777
  • [45] Regional efficiency in the European Union
    Ezcurra, Roberto
    Iraizoz, Belen
    Rapun, Manuel
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2008, 16 (08) : 1121 - 1143
  • [46] REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Sarudi, Csaba
    Molnarne, Barna Katalin
    Kovcs, Bernadett
    DETUROPE-THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM, 2011, 3 (01): : 56 - 74
  • [47] Regional polarization in the European Union
    Ezcurra, R
    Pascual, P
    Rapún, M
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2006, 14 (04) : 459 - 484
  • [48] Regional specialization in the European Union
    Ezcurra, Roberto
    Pascual, Pedro
    Rapun, Manuel
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 40 (06) : 601 - 616
  • [49] The concept of solidarity in cohesion policies of the European Union and Hungary
    Czirfusz, Marton
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2021, 39 (05) : 919 - 937
  • [50] The European Union Solidarity FundIts legitimacy, viability and efficiency
    Stefan Hochrainer
    Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer
    Reinhard Mechler
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2010, 15 : 797 - 810