Ecosystem-based management of coral reefs from afar-A guide for remote scientists and remote places

被引:3
|
作者
Cowburn, Benjamin [1 ]
Alliji, Khatija [2 ]
Bluemel, Joanna K. [3 ]
Couce, Elena [1 ]
Lawrance, Emma [4 ]
McManus, Edmund [1 ]
van Hoytema, Nanne [1 ,5 ]
Devlin, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci Cefas, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft NR33 OHT, Suffolk, England
[2] Woon PLC, 11 Westferry Circus, London E14 4HD, England
[3] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci Cefas, Barrack Rd, Weymouth DT4 8UB, Dorset, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, Fac Bldg,South Kensington Campus,South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, England
[5] Arcadis Nederland BV, Beaulieustr 22, NL-6814 DV Arnhem, Netherlands
关键词
Coral reef; Ecosystem -based management; Participatory approach; Socio-economics; Citizen science; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; MARINE CONSERVATION; WATER-QUALITY; SCIENCE; POLICY; OCEAN; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2022.09.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Modern-day coral reef conservation requires connections between researchers, decision-makers and stakeholders to achieve holistic ecosystem-based management (EBM), rooted in and supported by local communities. However, the COVID-19 pandemic, global political and financial instability and growing concerns over emissions from air travel have meant that face-to-face meetings and in-person fieldwork are increasingly difficult for many researchers at distant institutions. In this paper we discuss how to achieve EBM remotely, using a combination of freely available online data, remote fieldwork techniques and virtual communication and engagement tools. We highlight resources that have been useful in our work for components of overseas EBM and discuss lessons learned from those experiences. There are benefits to remote working, including reduced carbon emissions and travel costs, the ability to record and re-use electronic training materials, the ability to reach a wider audience than through face-to-face meetings and an increased reliance and division of labour with local researchers and stakeholders. However, developing new relationships and gaining a deeper contextual understanding of the local site and culture is not easily replaced by online or remote methods. Post-COVID-19, it is likely that some aspects of remote working within coral reef conservation will continue, as in many other aspects of global collaboration. We propose a blended approach where much of the work and collaboration is conducted online, but with some in-person visits to develop the key relationships or decisions are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mass transport from pollution sources to remote coral reefs in Eilat (Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea)
    Abelson, A
    Shteinman, B
    Fine, M
    Kaganovsky, S
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1999, 38 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [32] Institutional entrepreneurs, global networks, and the emergence of international institutions for ecosystem-based management: The Coral Triangle Initiative
    Rosen, Franciska
    Olsson, Per
    MARINE POLICY, 2013, 38 : 195 - 204
  • [33] Supporting Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management in meeting multiple objectives for sustainable use of coral reef ecosystems
    Weijerman, Mariska
    Oyafuso, Zack S.
    Leong, Kirsten M.
    Oleson, Kirsten L. L.
    Winston, Morgan
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 78 (08) : 2999 - 3011
  • [34] A framework for adaptive gear and ecosystem-based management in the artisanal coral reef fishery of Papua New Guinea
    McClanahan, T. R.
    Cinner, J. E.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2008, 18 (05) : 493 - 507
  • [35] Perspective on management strategic for sustainable development of coral reef fisheries at Ternate Island through ecosystem-based management approach
    Rumagia, F.
    Boer, M.
    Kurnia, R.
    Kamal, M. M.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FISHERIES AND MARINE, 2020, 584
  • [36] Ecological vulnerability assessment of coral islands and reefs in the South China Sea based on remote sensing and reanalysis data
    Ma, Yuan
    Jiang, Changbo
    Li, Shanshan
    Liu, Yizhuang
    Wen, Xiaofeng
    Long, Yuannan
    Yuan, Shuai
    Kang, Yuantai
    Wang, Yongjie
    Wu, Ruixuan
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [37] Perceptions of Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management Among State Natural Resource Agency Scientists in the Northeastern United States
    Safiq, Alexandrea
    Free, Christopher M.
    Caracappa, Joseph
    Valenti, Jessica L.
    Jensen, Olaf
    FISHERIES, 2021, 46 (02) : 66 - 75
  • [38] Implementing Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management: Lessons from Chile's experience
    Porobic, Javier
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Frusher, Stewart
    Parada, Carolina
    Haward, Marcus
    Ernst, Billy
    Stram, Diana
    MARINE POLICY, 2018, 97 : 82 - 90
  • [39] Lessons learned from an ecosystem-based management approach to restoration of a California estuary
    Wasson, Kerstin
    Suarez, Becky
    Akhavan, Antonia
    McCarthy, Erin
    Kildow, Judith
    Johnson, Kenneth S.
    Fountain, Monique C.
    Woolfolk, Andrea
    Silberstein, Mark
    Pendleton, Linwood
    Feliz, Dave
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 58 : 60 - 70
  • [40] Ecological data from observer programmes underpin ecosystem-based fisheries management
    Gilman, Eric
    Weijerman, Mariska
    Suuronen, Petri
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 74 (06) : 1481 - 1495