The public consultation is open: Insights from urban green infrastructure planning in Romania

被引:4
|
作者
Mitincu, Cristina-Gabriela [1 ]
Gradinaru, Simona R. [1 ]
Ioja, Ioan-Cristian [1 ]
Hartel, Tibor [2 ]
van Lierop, Martina [3 ]
Hossu, Constantina-Alina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Ctr Environm Res & Impact Studies, 1 Nicolae Balcescu Blvd, Bucharest 010041, Romania
[2] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Environm Sci & Engn, Dept Environm Sci, 30 Fantanele St, Cluj Napoca 400535, Romania
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Strateg Landscape Planning & Management, Sch Life Sci Weihenstephan, 6 Emil Ramann St, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
Consultation; Content analysis; Planning principles; Public comments; Urban Green infrastructure planning; USER PARTICIPATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPACES; MANAGEMENT; CITIES; RELIABILITY; QUALITY; POLICY; PLANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127985
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Due to its potential to help mitigate current societal challenges and provide ecological, social, and economic benefits, urban green infrastructure (UGI) is an important investment for cities. However, its planning and implementation may be challenging due to the limited application of the conceptual foundations and the oftenunknown character of the ways how the results of public consultations were integrated into the implemented UGI design. Using five Romanian urban areas as model system, we developed an evaluation protocol to assess 177 written comments submitted during the public consultation processes for 13 public UGI planning documents, along with the formal responses to these comments. Our results show critical comments towards the planning proposals (86.2 % of the comments) and a discussion of the shortcomings of the planning process (60.8 % of the comments). The analysis revealed that the UGI as it is developed and implemented currently in Romania has little public support as in 52.2 % of the comments none of UGI planning principles could be identified. Furthermore, we found a relatively low level of public comment consideration into the approved version of the planning documents as only 7.6 % of the comments were included, most of them being delegitimized by the responses of public officials/municipal administration. Thus, our results highlight that UGI consultation process is characterized by a lack of both genuine conceptual aspects and public participation substance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Flood-adaptive green infrastructure planning for urban resilience
    Hemin Lee
    Kihwan Song
    GoWoon Kim
    Jinhyung Chon
    Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2021, 17 : 427 - 437
  • [32] Urban ecological novelty assessment: Implications for urban green infrastructure planning and management
    Teixeira, Catarina Patoilo
    Fernandes, Claudia Oliveira
    Ahern, Jack
    Honrado, Joao Pradinho
    Farinha-Marques, Paulo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 773
  • [33] Advancing urban green infrastructure through participatory integrated planning: A case from Slovakia
    Vano, Simeon
    Olafsson, Anton Stahl
    Mederly, Peter
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2021, 58
  • [34] Mapping pollen allergenicity from urban trees in Valencia: A tool for green infrastructure planning
    Calatayud, Vicent
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 252
  • [35] Public Participation Procedure in Integrated Transport and Green Infrastructure Planning
    Finka, Maros
    Ondrejicka, Vladimir
    Jamecny, L'ubomir
    Husar, Milan
    WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [36] Cross Bay Link - Public Engagement in Planning Urban Infrastructure
    Hooton, M.
    Chang, P.
    Carter, M.
    Chan, S. Y.
    Chu, C. K.
    Wong, W. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH EAST ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION (EASEC12), 2011, 14
  • [37] Predicting context-sensitive urban green space quality to support urban green infrastructure planning
    Kajosaari, Anna
    Hasanzadeh, Kamyar
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Nummi, Pilvi
    Kuusisto-Hjort, Paula
    Kytta, Marketta
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 242
  • [38] Assessing the contribution of urban green spaces in green infrastructure strategy planning for urban ecosystem conditions and services
    Liu, On Yi
    Russo, Alessio
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 68
  • [39] Transitioning from gray to green (G2G)-A green infrastructure planning tool for the urban forest
    Tsegaye, Seneshaw
    Singleton, Thomas L.
    Koeser, Andrew K.
    Lamb, David S.
    Landry, Shawn M.
    Lu, Shen
    Barber, Joshua B.
    Hilbert, Deborah R.
    Hamilton, Keir O.
    Northrop, Robert J.
    Ghebremichael, Kebreab
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2019, 40 : 204 - 214
  • [40] Green infrastructure as a planning tool: A comprehensive systematization of urban redesign strategies to increase vegetation within public places
    Munoz, Luiza Sobhie
    Duarte, Denise Helena Silva
    CITIES, 2025, 156