Pluralizing energy justice: Incorporating feminist, anti-racist, Indigenous, and postcolonial perspectives

被引:80
|
作者
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,9 ]
Bell, Shannon Elizabeth [5 ]
Daggett, Cara [5 ]
Labuski, Christine [5 ]
Lennon, Myles [6 ]
Naylor, Lindsay [7 ]
Klinger, Julie [7 ]
Leonard, Kelsey [8 ]
Firestone, Jeremy [7 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Energy Technol, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Univ Sussex Business Sch, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Falmer, East Sussex, England
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Inst Global Sustainabil, Boston, MA USA
[5] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA USA
[6] Brown Univ, Providence, RI USA
[7] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE USA
[8] Univ Waterloo, Fac Environm, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Jubilee Bldg,Room 367, Falmer BN1 9SL, East Sussex, England
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Energy justice; Climate justice; Environmental justice; Anti; -racism; Feminism; Indigenist; Decolonial; Anti-colonialism; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; TRANSITION; CHALLENGE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2023.102996
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Justice represents not only a moral obligation but can enhance the legitimacy and acceptance of a rapid push toward global decarbonization. Innovations in technology, even those geared toward sustainability, can both reinforce and introduce new inequalities and disparities across populations, while also perpetuating environmental degradation. The concept of energy justice has emerged as a conceptual, methodological, and empirical tool to both highlight and remediate many of these concerns, with an emphasis on what is morally just or right. But much of this body of scholarship fails to adequately account for gender, Indigeneity, race, and other intersecting inequalities. Feminist, Indigenous, anti-racist and postcolonial approaches to justice offer an important remedy to theories of justice with underlying colonial, liberalist, majoritarian, utilitarian, or masculinist assumptions. Our Perspective is grounded in these four core, but often misperceived or even radical, approaches to justice. We first provide an overview of each of these approaches and then synthesize them into a set of themes, principles, and questions, which can guide future energy justice research and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条