共 50 条
The Impact of Hearing Loss and Its Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life Utility: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
被引:16
|作者:
Borre, Ethan D.
[1
,2
,3
]
Kaalund, Kamaria
[2
]
Frisco, Nicholas
[1
]
Zhang, Gloria
[1
]
Ayer, Austin
[1
]
Kelly-Hedrick, Margot
[1
]
Reed, Shelby D.
[3
,4
]
Emmett, Susan D.
[5
,6
]
Francis, Howard
[6
]
Tucci, Debara L.
[7
]
Wilson, Blake S.
[5
,6
,8
,9
]
Kosinski, Andrzej S.
[10
]
Ogbuoji, Osondu
[2
,5
,11
]
Schmidler, Gillian D. Sanders
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, 100 Fuqua Dr,Box 90120, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Clin Res Inst, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Duke Global Hlth Inst, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Dept Head & Neck Surg & Commun Sci, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[7] NIDCD, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[8] Duke Univ, Pratt Sch Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[9] Duke Univ, Pratt Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[10] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[11] Duke Global Hlth Inst, Ctr Policy Impact Global Hlth, Durham, NC USA
关键词:
cochlear implant;
hearing aid;
hearing loss;
health state utility values;
systematic review;
UNILATERAL COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION;
COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
OLDER-ADULTS;
DISABILITY WEIGHTS;
DEAFENED ADULTS;
GLOBAL BURDEN;
AID USE;
CHILDREN;
OUTCOMES;
IMPAIRMENT;
D O I:
10.1007/s11606-022-07795-9
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background Hearing loss significantly impacts health-related quality of life (QoL), yet the effects of current treatments on QoL utility remain uncertain. Our objective was to describe the impact of untreated and treated hearing loss on QoL utility to inform hearing healthcare policy. Methods We searched databases for articles published through 02/01/2021. Two independent reviewers screened for articles that reported elicitation of general QoL utility values for untreated and treated hearing loss health states. We extracted data and quality indicators from 62 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Results Included studies predominately used observational pre/post designs (61%), evaluated unilateral cochlear implantation (65%), administered the Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI3; 71%), and were conducted in Europe and North America (84%). In general, treatment of hearing loss improved post-treatment QoL utility when measured by most methods except the Euro-QoL 5 dimension (EQ-5D). In meta-analysis, hearing aids for adult mild-to-moderate hearing loss compared to no treatment significantly improved HUI3-estimated QoL utility (3 studies; mean change=0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07 to 0.14) but did not impact EQ-5D-estimated QoL (3 studies; mean change=0.0; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.04). Cochlear implants improved adult QoL utility 1-year post-implantation when measured by the HUI3 (7 studies; mean change=0.17; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.23); however, pediatric VAS-estimated QoL utility was non-significant (4 studies; mean change=0.12; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.25). The quality of included studies was limited by failure to report missingness of data and low survey response rates. Our study was limited by heterogeneous study populations and designs. Findings Treatment of hearing loss significantly improves QoL utility, and the HUI3 and VAS were most sensitive to improvements in hearing. Improved access to hearing healthcare should be prioritized. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021253314
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 479
页数:24
相关论文