Evaluating dynamics in human-bear interactions within social-ecological system

被引:0
|
作者
Ji, Yunrui [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Xuelei [1 ]
Li, Diqiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Forestry, Ecol & Nat Conservat Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] State Forestry & Grassland Adm, Key Lab Biodivers Conservat, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
habitat suitability; human-wildlife interaction; local communities; sustainable conservation; LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY; NATURE-RESERVE; CONSERVATION; WILDLIFE; AREA; YUNNAN; CHINA; MODEL; XISHUANGBANNA; DISTURBANCE;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10618
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Over the past few decades, social-ecological transformations have contributed to the restoration of numerous carnivores, presenting new challenges for human-wildlife coexistence. Evaluating and understanding human-wildlife interaction dynamics, particularly for conflict-prone species, is crucial for conservation and management strategies. Our study focuses on Asiatic Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus) in Western Yunnan, China, a region with favourable bear conditions and significant environmental changes due to conservation policies. This study employed a multifaceted approach to gather data on bear occurrences and human-bear conflicts. Utilising species distribution models, we predicted the potential bear habitat in 2000 and 2020. We proposed a methodology integrating bear habitat with human footprint to delineate the human-bear interface. Additionally, we evaluated the spatial-temporal variations in bear habitat and human-bear interface between 2000 and 2020. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to capture the perceptions of local communities regarding the bear population, human-bear interactions and conservation policies. Our findings indicated that the potential habitats of bears were strongly influenced by forest cover. We noticed improvements in bear habitat from 2000 to 2020, notwithstanding localised losses in specific areas. Most respondents attributed the increasing bear population to forest restoration and reduced human impact during this period. Notably, a significant proportion of respondents supported the conservation policies, previously participating in their formulation and implementation. Our analysis further revealed increases in the human-bear interface and human-bear interactions from 2000 to 2020. Remarkably, these changes did not significantly diminish local communities' endorsement of conservation policies. This resilience can be attributed to the net positive impacts of conservation policies on the livelihoods of these communities. Our study highlights the complexity and dynamic nature of human-wildlife interactions within the social-ecological system and provides new insights to facilitate sustainable conservation and management measures.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 918
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human responses to social-ecological traps
    Wiebren Johannes Boonstra
    Emma Björkvik
    L. Jamila Haider
    Vanessa Masterson
    Sustainability Science, 2016, 11 : 877 - 889
  • [22] Regime shifts in a social-ecological system
    Steven J. Lade
    Alessandro Tavoni
    Simon A. Levin
    Maja Schlüter
    Theoretical Ecology, 2013, 6 : 359 - 372
  • [23] Regime shifts in a social-ecological system
    Lade, Steven J.
    Tavoni, Alessandro
    Levin, Simon A.
    Schluter, Maja
    THEORETICAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 6 (03) : 359 - 372
  • [24] Spatial dynamics in the urban-rural-natural interface within a social-ecological hotspot
    Moreira-Munoz, Andres
    del Rio, Camilo
    Leguia-Cruz, Marcelo
    Mansilla-Quinones, Pablo
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 159
  • [25] Ecosystem size predicts social-ecological dynamics
    Kaemingk, Mark A.
    Chizinski, Christopher J.
    Allen, Craig R.
    Pope, Kevin L.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (02):
  • [26] War, relationality and social-ecological systems: an analysis of human-bird interactions
    Clark, Janine Natalya
    ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [27] To the rescue—Evaluating the social-ecological patterns for bird intakes
    R. Andrade
    H. L. Bateman
    K. L. Larson
    C. Herzog
    J. A. Brown
    Urban Ecosystems, 2022, 25 : 179 - 192
  • [28] Understanding and evaluating the resilience of rural human settlements with a social-ecological system framework: The case of Chongqing Municipality, China
    Liu, Runqiu
    Zhang, Lie
    Tang, Yudi
    Jiang, Yongmu
    LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 136
  • [29] Coexistence across space and time: Social-ecological patterns within a decade of human-coyote interactions in San Francisco
    Wilkinson, Christine E.
    Caspi, Tal
    Stanton, Lauren A.
    Campbell, Deb
    Schell, Christopher J.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2023, 5 (06) : 2158 - 2177
  • [30] Promoting agency for social-ecological transformation: a transformation-lab in the Xochimilco social-ecological system
    Charli-Joseph, Lakshmi
    Mario Siqueiros-Garcia, J.
    Eakin, Hallie
    Manuel-Navarrete, David
    Shelton, Rebecca
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (02):