Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the 'Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY' (RUBY) randomised controlled trial

被引:2
|
作者
McLardie-Hore, Fiona E. [1 ,2 ]
Forster, Della A. [1 ,2 ]
McLachlan, H. L. [2 ,3 ]
Shafiei, Touran [2 ]
Amir, Lisa H. [2 ]
Davey, Mary-Ann [4 ]
Grimes, Heather [2 ,5 ]
Gold, Lisa [6 ]
机构
[1] Royal Womens Hosp, Midwifery & Matern Serv Res, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Judith Lumley Ctr, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Obstet & Gynaecol, Monash Hlth, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] La Trobe Univ, Rural Hlth Sch, Bendigo, Vic, Australia
[6] Deakin Univ, Deakin Hlth Econ, Burwood, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
public health; health economics; paediatrics; EXPERIENCES; PROMOTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe 'Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY' (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supports. The present study aimed to evaluate if the intervention was cost-effective.DesignA within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.SettingThree metropolitan maternity services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ParticipantsFirst time mothers intending to breastfeed their infant (1152) and peer volunteers (246).InterventionThe intervention comprised proactive telephone-based support from a peer volunteer from early postpartum up to 6 months. Participants were allocated to usual care (n=578) or the intervention (n=574).Main outcome measuresCosts during a 6-month follow-up period including individual healthcare, breastfeeding support and intervention costs in all participants, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.ResultsCosts per mother supported were valued at $263.75 (or $90.33 excluding costs of donated volunteer time). There was no difference between the two arms in costs for infant and mothers in healthcare and breastfeeding support costs. These figures result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4146 ($1393 if volunteer time excluded) per additional mother breast feeding at 6 months.ConclusionConsidering the significant improvement in breastfeeding outcomes, this intervention is potentially cost-effective. These findings, along with the high value placed on the intervention by women and peer volunteers provides robust evidence to upscale the implementation of this intervention.Trial registration numberACTRN12612001024831.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention with and without telephone support in primary care (SupportBack 2): a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness
    Geraghty, Adam W. A.
    Becque, Taeko
    Roberts, Lisa C.
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Yardley, Lucy
    Stuart, Beth
    Turner, David A.
    Hay, Elaine
    Griffiths, Gareth
    Webley, Frances
    Durcan, Lorraine
    Morgan, Alannah
    Hughes, Stephanie
    Bathers, Sarah
    Butler-Walley, Stephanie
    Wathall, Simon
    Mansell, Gemma
    White, Malcolm
    Davies, Firoza
    Little, Paul
    LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 6 (07): : e424 - e437
  • [32] A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Sonia Johnson
    Luke Sheridan Rains
    Steven Marwaha
    John Strang
    Thomas Craig
    Tim Weaver
    Paul McCrone
    Michael King
    David Fowler
    Stephen Pilling
    Louise Marston
    Rumana Z. Omar
    Meghan Craig
    Mark Hinton
    Trials, 17
  • [33] A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Johnson, Sonia
    Rains, Luke Sheridan
    Marwaha, Steven
    Strang, John
    Craig, Thomas
    Weaver, Tim
    McCrone, Paul
    King, Michael
    Fowler, David
    Pilling, Stephen
    Marston, Louise
    Omar, Rumana Z.
    Craig, Meghan
    Hinton, Mark
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [34] Muslim communities learning about second-hand smoke: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Shah, Sarwat
    Ainsworth, Hannah
    Fairhurst, Caroline
    Tilbrook, Helen
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Amos, Amanda
    Parrott, Steve
    Torgerson, David
    Thompson, Heather
    King, Rebecca
    Mir, Ghazala
    Siddiqi, Kamran
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 25
  • [35] Muslim communities learning about second-hand smoke: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Sarwat Shah
    Hannah Ainsworth
    Caroline Fairhurst
    Helen Tilbrook
    Aziz Sheikh
    Amanda Amos
    Steve Parrott
    David Torgerson
    Heather Thompson
    Rebecca King
    Ghazala Mir
    Kamran Siddiqi
    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 25
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness of a community-delivered multicomponent intervention compared with enhanced standard care of obese adolescents: cost-utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial (the HELP trial)
    Panca, Monica
    Christie, Deborah
    Cole, Tim J.
    Costa, Silvia
    Gregson, John
    Holt, Rebecca
    Hudson, Lee D.
    Kessel, Anthony S.
    Kinra, Sanjay
    Mathiot, Anne
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Wataranan, Jay
    Wong, Ian Chi Kei
    Viner, Russell M.
    Morris, Stephen
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [37] Investigating the cost-effectiveness of videotelephone based support for newly diagnosed paediatric oncology patients and their families: design of a randomised controlled trial
    Mark Bensink
    Richard Wootton
    Helen Irving
    Andrew Hallahan
    Deborah Theodoros
    Trevor Russell
    Paul Scuffham
    Adrian G Barnett
    BMC Health Services Research, 7
  • [38] Investigating the cost-effectiveness of videotelephone based support for newly diagnosed paediatric oncology patients and their families: design of a randomised controlled trial
    Bensink, Mark
    Wootton, Richard
    Irving, Helen
    Hallahan, Andrew
    Theodoros, Deborah
    Russell, Trevor
    Scuffham, Paul
    Barnett, Adrian G.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [39] The second Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT-2) trial: does the provision of telephone support enhance the effectiveness of computer-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy? A randomised controlled trial
    Brabyn, Sally
    Araya, Ricardo
    Barkham, Michael
    Bower, Peter
    Cooper, Cindy
    Duarte, Ana
    Kessler, David
    Knowles, Sarah
    Lovell, Karina
    Littlewood, Elizabeth
    Mattock, Richard
    Palmer, Stephen
    Pervin, Jodi
    Richards, David
    Tallon, Debbie
    White, David
    Walker, Simon
    Worthy, Gillian
    Gilbody, Simon
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 20 (89) : 1 - +
  • [40] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an electronic mindfulness-based intervention to improve maternal mental health in the peripartum: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Branjerdporn, Grace
    Gillespie, Kerri
    Martin, Elizabeth
    Kissane, Vivianne
    De Young, Alex
    Ewais, Tatjana
    Goldsmith, Kathleen
    Wilson, Susan
    Adhikary, Sam
    McGahan, Greg
    Schulz, Constanze
    Beckmann, Michael
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)