Prostate cancer grade migration and facility-level treatment trends for grade group 1 disease

被引:3
|
作者
Borregales, Leonardo D. [1 ]
Tzeng, Michael [1 ]
Ramaswamy, Ashwin [1 ]
Gu, Xiangmei [2 ]
Davuluri, Meenakshi [1 ]
Nagar, Himanshu [3 ]
Hu, Jim C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med New York Presbyterian, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Healthcare Policy & Res, New York, NY USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med New York Presbyterian, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[4] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med, Dept Urol, 525 East 68th St,Starr 900, New York, NY 10065 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1093/jncics/pkad018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-grade prostate cancer (PCa) reflect poor quality of care and prompted changes to guidelines over the past decade. We used the National Cancer Database to characterize Gleason Grade Group (GG)1 PCa diagnosis trends and assess facility-level treatment variability. Between 2010 and 2019, GG1 PCa incidence had a clinically and statistically significant decline, from 45% to 25% at biopsy and from 33% to 9.8% at radical prostatectomy (RP) pathology. Similarly, active surveillance (AS) uptake significantly increased to 49% and 62% among nonacademic and academic sites, respectively. Decreasing rates of definitive therapies were identified: among academic sites, RP decreased from 61.1% to 25.3% and radiation therapy (RT) from 25.2% to 12%, whereas among nonacademic sites, RP decreased from 53.6% to 28% and RT from 37.8% to 21.9% (P-trend < .001). Declines in the diagnosis and treatment of low-grade disease demonstrate an encouraging shift in PCa epidemiology. However, heterogeneity in AS utilization remains and reflects opportunities for improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Grade Migration of Prostate Cancer in the United States During the Last Decade
    Borregales, Leonardo D.
    DeMeo, Gina
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Cheng, Emily
    Dudley, Vanessa
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Nagar, Himanshu
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Vickers, Andrew
    Hu, Jim C.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (07): : 1012 - 1019
  • [22] Contemporary grading and staging impact on grade and stage migration in prostate cancer
    Moscovita, Falzarano S.
    Zhou, M.
    Klein, E.
    Galluzzi, Magi C.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2009, 455 : 141 - 141
  • [23] Optimized grade group for reporting prostate cancer grade in both systematic and MRI-targeted biopsies
    Song, G.
    He, Y.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S928 - S928
  • [24] Biopsy Global Grade Group vs. Highest Grade Group vs. Largest Volume Cancer Grade Group: Concordance of Biopsy 'Case Level' and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Groups
    Trpkov, Kiril
    Sangkhamanon, Sakkarn
    Yilmaz, Asli
    Medlicott, Shaun
    Zdravkovski, Panche
    Bismar, Tarek
    Shea-Budgell, Melissa A.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 394 - 394
  • [25] Biopsy Global Grade Group vs. Highest Grade Group vs. Largest Volume Cancer Grade Group: Concordance of Biopsy 'Case Level' and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Groups
    Trpkov, Kiril
    Sangkhamanon, Sakkarn
    Yilmaz, Asli
    Medlicott, Shaun
    Zdravkovski, Panche
    Bismar, Tarek
    Shea-Budgell, Melissa A.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 394 - 394
  • [26] Low-grade prostate cancer diverges early from high grade and metastatic disease
    VanderWeele, David J.
    Brown, Christopher D.
    Taxy, Jerome B.
    Gillard, Marc
    Hatcher, David M.
    Tom, Westin R.
    Stadler, Walter M.
    White, Kevin P.
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2014, 105 (08) : 1079 - 1085
  • [27] Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
    Shore, Neal
    Kaplan, Steven A.
    Tutrone, Ronald
    Levin, Richard
    Bailen, James
    Hay, Alan
    Kalota, Susan
    Bidair, Mohamed
    Freedman, Sheldon
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Snoy, Frederick
    Epstein, Jonathan, I
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 3101 - 3111
  • [28] Significant Survival Differences for Grade Group 4 and Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer: Detailed Reporting of Pathohistology and Modern Diagnostic Algorithms Are Needed To Tailor Treatment
    Heidenreich, Axel
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (02): : 211 - 212
  • [29] Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
    Neal Shore
    Steven A. Kaplan
    Ronald Tutrone
    Richard Levin
    James Bailen
    Alan Hay
    Susan Kalota
    Mohamed Bidair
    Sheldon Freedman
    Kenneth Goldberg
    Frederick Snoy
    Jonathan I. Epstein
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 3101 - 3111
  • [30] TRENDS IN DEFINITIVE THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A GRADE-BY-GRADE-ANALYSIS
    Beatrici, Edoardo
    Labban, Muhieddine
    Stone, Benjamin V.
    Filipas, Dejan K.
    Voleti, Sandeep S.
    Frego, Nicola
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    Abdollah, Firas
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E1110 - E1110